Porsche Cayman (981C)
Car comparison
Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4vsBMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 440i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 4 Series Coupe (F32)
440i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 440i
- Most powerful326 hp243 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions159 g/km
- Best estimated range882 km548 mi
- Largest trunk445 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed283 km/h176 mph
- Lightest1,340 kg2,954 lb
- Best power-to-weight243 hp/t181 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
- Best performance score71/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)440i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 325hp242kW | 326hp243kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,340kg2,954lb | 1,555kg3,428lb |
| Gross weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 2,075kg4,575lb |
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 67.4s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph Calculated | 67.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 5.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.7s Calculated | 17.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 4.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 13.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 243hp/t181kW/t110hp/1000 lb Calculated | 210hp/t156kW/t95hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 276Nm/t185lb-ft/ton Calculated | 289Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 711km442mi Calculated | 882km548mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,436cc210cu in | 2,998cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,380mm172in | 4,638mm183in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,825mm72in |
| Height | 1,295mm51in | 1,377mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,810mm111in |
| Front track | - | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,594mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 130mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 445L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 211g/km | 159g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4: Power / Torque
- BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 440i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 7,400 rpm | 4,500-5,800 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)440i | 5,500 rpm | 1,380-5,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)440i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 4.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 5.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.7 s | 17.4 s |
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 13.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 113 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 325 hp 242 kW |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)440i | 326 hp 243 kW |
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 440i has 1 hp more than Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4 and BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 440i: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)440i | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)440i | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)440i | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 5.0 s |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)440i | 5.0 s |
Although BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 440i has more power, Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)440i | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 440i and Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)440i | 210 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 711 km 442 mi |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)440i | 882 km 548 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 325 hp 242 kW | 5.0 s | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)440i | 326 hp 243 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)440i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)440i |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 440i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)440i | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)440i | 210 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)440i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 325 hp 242 kW | 326 hp 243 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 5.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 711 km 442 mi | 882 km 548 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 211 g/km | 159 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 210 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4 | BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 440i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.75 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,363 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4
- Is 215 kg lighter
- Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 33 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 440i
- Has 1 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 171 km (106 mi) more estimated range
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
- Emits 52 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























