BMW 3 Series Touring (G21)
Car comparison
BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 320dvsSkoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 320d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score94/100
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI
- Lightest1,335 kg2,943 lb
- Best power-to-weight142 hp/t106 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,585kg3,494lb | 1,335kg2,943lb |
| Gross weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | 1,920kg4,233lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 70.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.7s Calculated | 29.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 252Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated | 240Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 833km518mi Calculated | 820km509mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,709mm185in | 4,667mm184in |
| Width | 1,827mm72in | 1,814mm71in |
| Height | 1,440mm57in | 1,465mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,851mm112in | 2,686mm106in |
| Front track | 1,573mm62in | 1,543mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,569mm62in | 1,542mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 141mm6in | 141mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 610L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,510L | 1,740L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 125g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 320d: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.7 s | 29.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 7.1 s |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 320d and Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 320d and Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 833 km 518 mi |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 820 km 509 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.1 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 320d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 833 km 518 mi | 820 km 509 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 125 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 320d | Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 10.67 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,601 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 320d
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 14 km (8 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI
- Is 250 kg lighter
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 110 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























