BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20)
Car comparison
BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320ivsJaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2019 D180
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2019
D180
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t89 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions138 g/km
- Best estimated range1,077 km669 mi
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320i | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,610kg3,549lb |
| Gross weight | 2,130kg4,696lb | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.3s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 74.6s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.5s Calculated | 35.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 195Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated | 267Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 937km582mi Calculated | 1,077km669mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,709mm185in | 4,678mm184in |
| Width | 1,827mm72in | 1,967mm77in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,851mm112in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | - | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,583mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 125mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 410L |
| Max trunk volume | 480L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 56L |
| CO2 emissions | 143g/km | 138g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320i: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320i | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,350-4,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320i | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.5 s | 35.7 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320i | 184 hp 137 kW |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 180 hp 134 kW |
BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320i has 4 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180 and BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320i: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320i | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320i | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320i | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320i | 7.6 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 8.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320i and Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320i | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180 and BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320i: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320i | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320i | 937 km 582 mi |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 1,077 km 669 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320i | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.6 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.4 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320i |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320i | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320i | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320i | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 937 km 582 mi | 1,077 km 669 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 143 g/km | 138 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320i | Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320i
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180
- Has 130 Nm more
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 140 km (87 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 5 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























