BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) · Facelift 2001
Car comparison
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) · Facelift 2001 330ivsNissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan Cedric (Y34)
2.5T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) Facelift 2001 330i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed247 km/h153 mph
- Lightest1,465 kg3,230 lb
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score81/100
Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque319 Nm235 lb-ft
- Best estimated range661 km411 mi
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330i | NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 319Nm235lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,465kg3,230lb | 1,720kg3,792lb |
| Gross weight | 1,965kg4,332lb | - |
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 63.6s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph Calculated | 73.6s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.7s Calculated | 28.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14L/100 km16.8mpg US20.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 656km408mi Calculated | 661km411mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,498cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,471mm176in | 4,865mm192in |
| Width | 1,739mm68in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,415mm56in | 1,465mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,725mm107in | 2,800mm110in |
| Front track | 1,471mm58in | 1,510mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,483mm58in | 1,510mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 440L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) Facelift 2001 330i: Power / Torque
- Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330i | 5,900 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 6,400 rpm | 2,800 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330i | NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.7 s | 28.9 s |
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330i | 231 hp 172 kW |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 250 hp 186 kW |
Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T has 19 hp more than BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) Facelift 2001 330i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) Facelift 2001 330i and Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T: 19 hp (14 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330i | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 319 Nm 235 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330i | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330i | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330i | 7.0 s |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 7.8 s |
Although Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T has more power, BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) Facelift 2001 330i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) Facelift 2001 330i and Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330i | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) Facelift 2001 330i and Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330i | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330i | 656 km 408 mi |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 661 km 411 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330i | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.0 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.8 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330i |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T |
| 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) Facelift 2001 330i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330i | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330i | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330i | NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 319 Nm 235 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 656 km 408 mi | 661 km 411 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) Facelift 2001 330i | Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.80 LC100 km | 21.18 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,520 LC/year | 3,176 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) Facelift 2001 330i
- Is 255 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T
- Has 19 hp more
- Has 19 Nm more
- Has 5 km (3 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























