BMW X5 (F15)
Car comparison
BMW X5 (F15) 25dvsBMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)
220d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Lightest1,565 kg3,450 lb
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions133 g/km
- Best overall score64/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score93/100
BMW X5 (F15) 25d
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,518 km943 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best performance score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX5 (F15)25d | BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 1,565kg3,450lb |
| Gross weight | 2,755kg6,074lb | 2,210kg4,872lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 108.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 84.9s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 46.2s Calculated | 40.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,518km943mi Calculated | 1,196km743mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,886mm192in | 4,556mm179in |
| Width | 1,938mm76in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,762mm69in | 1,608mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,780mm109in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,557mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,650mm65in | 1,558mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 209mm8in | 165mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 650L | 645L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,870L | 1,905L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 61L |
| CO2 emissions | 148g/km | 133g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X5 (F15) 25d: Power / Torque
- BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX5 (F15)25d | BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 46.2 s | 40.8 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 231 hp 172 kW |
| BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d | 190 hp 142 kW |
BMW X5 (F15) 25d has 41 hp more than BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220d and BMW X5 (F15) 25d: 41 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb |
| BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 7.7 s |
| BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d | 7.6 s |
Although BMW X5 (F15) 25d has more power, BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220d and BMW X5 (F15) 25d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220d and BMW X5 (F15) 25d: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d | 121 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 1,518 km 943 mi |
| BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d | 1,196 km 743 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.7 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (F15)25d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (F15)25d |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (F15) 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d | 121 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX5 (F15)25d | BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,518 km 943 mi | 1,196 km 743 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 148 g/km | 133 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | 645 L 22.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X5 (F15) 25d | BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.80 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,470 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X5 (F15) 25d
- Has 41 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 322 km (200 mi) more estimated range
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220d
- Is 475 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 15 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























