BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06)
Car comparison
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 218ivsVolkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Touran II
1.5 TSI ACT
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.9 s
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight100 hp/t74 kW/t10.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,018 km632 mi
- Largest trunk834 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score42/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score95/100
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 218i
- Fastest top speed214 km/h133 mph
- Lightest1,470 kg3,241 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218i | VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 136hp101kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 230Nm170lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,470kg3,241lb | 1,505kg3,318lb |
| Gross weight | 2,015kg4,442lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.9s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 95.5s99% target: 207 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.0s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 51.0s Calculated | 60.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.5s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 93hp/t69kW/t42hp/1000 lb Calculated | 100hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 156Nm/t105lb-ft/ton Calculated | 166Nm/t111lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 662km411mi Calculated | 1,018km632mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,499cc91cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,386mm173in | 4,527mm178in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,829mm72in |
| Height | 1,576mm62in | 1,674mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,786mm110in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,587mm62in | 1,542mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 171mm7in | 156mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 834L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,455L | 1,980L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 130g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 218i: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218i | 4,400-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | - | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218i | VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.5 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.0 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 51.0 s | 60.1 s |
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 87 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218i | 136 hp 101 kW |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 150 hp 112 kW |
Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT has 14 hp more than BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 218i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 218i and Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218i | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218i | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218i | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 209 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218i | 9.0 s |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 8.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT and BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 218i: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218i | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT and BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 218i: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218i | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 100 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218i | 662 km 411 mi |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 1,018 km 632 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218i | 136 hp 101 kW | 9.0 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 209 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218i |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218i | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218i | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 100 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218i | VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 136 hp 101 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.0 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 662 km 411 mi | 1,018 km 632 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 130 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 834 L 29.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp | 100 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 218i | Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 9.98 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,496 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 218i
- Is 35 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 356 km (221 mi) more estimated range
- Has 364 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























