BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06)
Car comparison
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 218dvsFord S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord S-MAX II
2.0 TDCi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t89 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,273 km791 mi
- Largest trunk700 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best practicality score95/100
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 218d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.8 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Lightest1,545 kg3,406 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218d | FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,545kg3,406lb | 1,766kg3,893lb |
| Gross weight | 2,085kg4,597lb | 2,575kg5,677lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 96.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 101.1s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.8s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 44.6s Calculated | 48.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 97hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated | 255Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 849km528mi Calculated | 1,273km791mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,386mm173in | 4,796mm189in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,916mm75in |
| Height | 1,576mm62in | 1,655mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,849mm112in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,606mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,587mm62in | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 171mm7in | 150mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 700L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,455L | 2,200L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 144g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 218d: Power / Torque
- Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218d | 3,750-4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 3,750 rpm | 2,000-2,250 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218d | FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.8 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 44.6 s | 48.1 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218d | 150 hp 112 kW |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 210 hp 157 kW |
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi has 60 hp more than BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 218d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 218d and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi: 60 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218d | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218d | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 1,766 kg 3,893 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218d | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218d | 8.8 s |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 8.8 s |
Although Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi has more power, BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 218d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218d | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218d | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218d | 849 km 528 mi |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 1,273 km 791 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218d | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.8 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 210 hp 157 kW | 8.8 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218d |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218d | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218d | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218d | FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.8 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | 1,766 kg 3,893 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 849 km 528 mi | 1,273 km 791 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 144 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 700 L 24.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 218d | Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.28 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,391 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 218d
- Is 221 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi
- Has 60 hp more
- Has 90 Nm more
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 424 km (263 mi) more estimated range
- Has 230 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























