XPENG X9 · Facelift 2026
Car comparison
XPENG X9 · Facelift 2026 94.8 kWhvsBMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45)
218d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 94.8 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Most powerful347 hp259 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight122 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best practicality score96/100
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d
- Lightest1,375 kg3,031 lb
- Best economy score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | XPENGX9Facelift 202694.8 kWh | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 347hp259kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,850kg6,283lb | 1,375kg3,031lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,920kg4,233lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 99.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 86.1s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 58.9s Calculated | 57.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 158Nm/t106lb-ft/ton Calculated | 240Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 1,186km737mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 5,316mm209in | 4,342mm171in |
| Width | 1,988mm78in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,785mm70in | 1,555mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 3,160mm124in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | - | 1,561mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,562mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 165mm6in |
| Trunk volume | - | 468L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,510L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 114g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | XPENGX9Facelift 202694.8 kWh | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 58.9 s | 57.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 87 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XPENGX9Facelift 202694.8 kWh | 347 hp 259 kW |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 150 hp 112 kW |
XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 94.8 kWh has 197 hp more than BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d and XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 94.8 kWh: 197 hp (147 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XPENGX9Facelift 202694.8 kWh | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XPENGX9Facelift 202694.8 kWh | 2,850 kg 6,283 lb |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XPENGX9Facelift 202694.8 kWh | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 208 km/h 129 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XPENGX9Facelift 202694.8 kWh | 8.2 s |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 8.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 94.8 kWh and BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XPENGX9Facelift 202694.8 kWh | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| XPENGX9Facelift 202694.8 kWh | 347 hp 259 kW | 8.2 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XPENGX9Facelift 202694.8 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | XPENGX9Facelift 202694.8 kWh | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 347 hp 259 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,850 kg 6,283 lb | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,186 km 737 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 114 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 468 L 16.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.52 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,129 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 94.8 kWh
- Has 197 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d
- Is 1,475 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























