Volkswagen Touran II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACTvsBMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45)
218d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Lightest1,375 kg3,031 lb
- Best power-to-weight109 hp/t81 kW/t9.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.9 L/100 km60.3 mpg US72.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions114 g/km
- Best estimated range1,186 km737 mi
- Best performance score44/100
- Best economy score95/100
Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.9 s
- Fastest top speed209 km/h130 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Largest trunk834 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best practicality score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,505kg3,318lb | 1,375kg3,031lb |
| Gross weight | 2,110kg4,652lb | 1,920kg4,233lb |
| Top speed | 209 km/h 130 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 95.5s99% target: 207 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 86.7s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 60.1s Calculated | 57.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 100hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 166Nm/t111lb-ft/ton Calculated | 240Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,018km632mi Calculated | 1,186km737mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,527mm178in | 4,342mm171in |
| Width | 1,829mm72in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,674mm66in | 1,555mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,786mm110in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | 1,561mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,542mm61in | 1,562mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 156mm6in | 165mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 834L | 468L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,980L | 1,510L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | 130g/km | 114g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT: Power / Torque
- BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | - | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.4 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.9 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 60.1 s | 57.9 s |
| Top speed | 209 km/h 130 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 138 km/h 86 mph | 139 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 150 hp 112 kW |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 208 km/h 129 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 8.9 s |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 8.9 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d and Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 100 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 1,018 km 632 mi |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 1,186 km 737 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 100 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.9 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 209 km/h 130 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,018 km 632 mi | 1,186 km 737 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 130 g/km | 114 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 834 L 29.5 cu ft | 468 L 16.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 100 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT | BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.98 LC100 km | 7.52 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,496 LC/year | 1,129 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 366 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 130 kg lighter
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 169 km (105 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 16 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























