Car comparison

Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8vsBitter Vero 6.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF (X250)

4.2 V8

416 hp4196 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedSedan2007-2009
VS

Bitter Vero

6.0 V8

378 hp5967 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSedan2008-2008

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    416 hp
    310 kW
  • Highest torque
    560 Nm
    413 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,842 kg
    4,061 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    226 hp/t
    168 kW/t
    4.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.6 L/100 km
    18.7 mpg US
    22.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    556 km
    345 mi
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best overall score
    75/100
  • Best performance score
    74/100
  • Best economy score
    73/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8BitterVero6.0 V8
Power
416hp310kW
378hp282kW
Torque
560Nm413lb-ft
535Nm395lb-ft
Curb weight
1,842kg4,061lb
1,890kg4,167lb
Gross weight
2,330kg5,137lb
2,298kg5,066lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
52.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
56.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.4s
5.5s
0-200 km/h
16.1s
Calculated
16.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.2s
Calculated
5.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK
14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
18.7L/100 km12.6mpg US15.1mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.3s
Calculated
13.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
226hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb
Calculated
200hp/t149kW/t91hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton
Calculated
283Nm/t189lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
556km345mi
Calculated
507km315mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,196cc256cu in
5,967cc364cu in
Length
4,961mm195in
5,200mm205in
Width
1,877mm74in
1,899mm75in
Height
1,460mm57in
1,460mm57in
Wheelbase
2,909mm115in
3,009mm118in
Front track
1,559mm61in
1,602mm63in
Rear track
1,571mm62in
1,618mm64in
Trunk volume
540L
535L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
73L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8Bitter Vero 6.0 V8PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8: Power / Torque
  • Bitter Vero 6.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V86,250 rpm3,500 rpm6,500 rpm
BitterVero6.0 V85,700 rpm4,400 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8BitterVero6.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.2 s
5.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.4 s
5.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
16.1 s
16.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.9 s
9.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.3 s
11.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.3 s
13.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
182 km/h
113 mph
180 km/h
112 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8
416 hp
310 kW
BitterVero6.0 V8
378 hp
282 kW

Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8 has 38 hp more than Bitter Vero 6.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Bitter Vero 6.0 V8 and Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8: 38 hp (28 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8
560 Nm
413 lb-ft
BitterVero6.0 V8
535 Nm
395 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8
1,842 kg
4,061 lb
BitterVero6.0 V8
1,890 kg
4,167 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
BitterVero6.0 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V85.4 s
BitterVero6.0 V85.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8 and Bitter Vero 6.0 V8: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8
12.6 L/100 km
18.7 mpg US
22.4 mpg UK
BitterVero6.0 V8
14.4 L/100 km
16.3 mpg US
19.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8 and Bitter Vero 6.0 V8: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8
226 hp/t
168 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
BitterVero6.0 V8
200 hp/t
149 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8
556 km
345 mi
BitterVero6.0 V8
507 km
315 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8
416 hp
310 kW
5.4 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
BitterVero6.0 V8
378 hp
282 kW
5.5 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8
Power
416 hp
310 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,961 mm
195.3 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
BitterVero6.0 V8
Power
378 hp
282 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
535 L
18.9 cu ft
Length
5,200 mm
204.7 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8
Power
416 hp
310 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
12.6 L/100 km
18.7 mpg US
22.4 mpg UK
BitterVero6.0 V8
Power
378 hp
282 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
14.4 L/100 km
16.3 mpg US
19.6 mpg UK

Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8
12.6 L/100 km
18.7 mpg US
22.4 mpg UK
5.4 s
BitterVero6.0 V8
14.4 L/100 km
16.3 mpg US
19.6 mpg UK
5.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8
226 hp/t
168 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
12.6 L/100 km
18.7 mpg US
22.4 mpg UK
BitterVero6.0 V8
200 hp/t
149 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
14.4 L/100 km
16.3 mpg US
19.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8BitterVero6.0 V8
Power
416 hp
310 kW
378 hp
282 kW
Torque
560 Nm
413 lb-ft
535 Nm
395 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.4 s
5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,842 kg
4,061 lb
1,890 kg
4,167 lb
Fuel consumption
12.6 L/100 km
18.7 mpg US
22.4 mpg UK
14.4 L/100 km
16.3 mpg US
19.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,961 mm
195.3 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
535 L
18.9 cu ft
Length
5,200 mm
204.7 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Range score
556 km
345 mi
507 km
315 mi
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
535 L
18.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
226 hp/t
168 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
200 hp/t
149 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8Bitter Vero 6.0 V8
Consumption12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK14.4 L/100 km16.3 mpg US19.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km22.05 LC100 km25.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi35.49 LC100 mi40.56 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,890 L499 US gal416 UK gal2,160 L571 US gal475 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,308 LC/year3,780 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8

  • Has 38 hp more
  • Has 25 Nm more
  • Is 48 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 49 km (30 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 5 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Bitter Vero 6.0 V8

No measurable advantages in the available data.

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8
Bitter Vero 6.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.2 V8
S 3.0 V6
VS
JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8vsJaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6
6.0 V8
460 V8
VS
BitterVero6.0 V8vsLexusLS IV460 V8
4.2 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8vsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
6.0 V8
E 500 V8
VS
BitterVero6.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W211)Facelift 2006E 500 V8
4.2 V8
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
6.0 V8
S 500
VS
BitterVero6.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzS-class (W221)S 500
4.2 V8
S 3.0 V6
VS
JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)S 3.0 V6
6.0 V8
R 4.2 V8
VS
BitterVero6.0 V8vsJaguarXJ (X358)R 4.2 V8
6.0 V8
4.2 FSI V8
VS
BitterVero6.0 V8vsAUDIA8 (D3/4E)Facelift 20074.2 FSI V8
4.2 V8
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
6.0 V8
750i
VS
BitterVero6.0 V8vsBMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005750i
4.2 V8
4.2 V8 32V L Super
VS
JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8vsJaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L Super
Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8 vs Bitter Vero 6.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster