Car comparison

Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) GTS 3.8 V8vsBentley Mulsanne II · Facelift 2016 Speed 6.75 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156)

GTS 3.8 V8

530 hp3799 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2013-2016
VS

Bentley Mulsanne II · Facelift 2016

Speed 6.75 V8

537 hp6752 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2016-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) GTS 3.8 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    315 km/h
    196 mph Unrestricted
    307 km/h
    191 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,900 kg
    4,189 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    279 hp/t
    208 kW/t
    3.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.7 L/100 km
    22.0 mpg US
    26.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    15.6 L/100 km
    15.1 mpg US
    18.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.9 L/100 km
    29.8 mpg US
    35.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    250 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    748 km
    465 mi
  • Largest trunk
    530 L
  • Best overall score
    84/100
  • Best performance score
    88/100
  • Best economy score
    78/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
Power
530hp395kW
537hp400kW
Torque
710Nm524lb-ft
1,100Nm811lb-ft
Curb weight
1,900kg4,189lb
2,685kg5,919lb
Gross weight-
3,200kg7,055lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
307 km/h191 mph
Calculated
305 km/h
190 mph
To 99% top speed
53.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
60.6s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.7s
4.9s
0-200 km/h
12.1s
Calculated
13.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.5s
Calculated
4.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK
22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.4s
Calculated
12.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
279hp/t208kW/t127hp/1000 lb
Calculated
200hp/t149kW/t91hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
374Nm/t250lb-ft/ton
Calculated
410Nm/t274lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
748km465mi
Calculated
658km409mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,799cc232cu in
6,752cc412cu in
Length
5,262mm207in
5,575mm219in
Width
1,948mm77in
-
Height
1,481mm58in
1,521mm60in
Wheelbase
3,171mm125in
3,266mm129in
Front track
1,634mm64in
1,605mm63in
Rear track
1,647mm65in
1,651mm65in
Trunk volume
530L
443L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
80L
96L
CO2 emissions
250g/km
342g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) GTS 3.8 V8Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 Speed 6.75 V8PowerTorque
  • Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) GTS 3.8 V8: Power / Torque
  • Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 Speed 6.75 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V86,500-6,800 rpm2,250-3,500 rpm7,050 rpm
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V84,000 rpm1,750 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.5 s
4.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.7 s
4.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
12.1 s
13.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
307 km/h191 mph
Likely limited
305 km/h
190 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.8 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
8.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.6 s
10.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.4 s
12.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
203 km/h
126 mph
193 km/h
120 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8
530 hp
395 kW
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
537 hp
400 kW

Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 Speed 6.75 V8 has 7 hp more than Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) GTS 3.8 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) GTS 3.8 V8 and Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 Speed 6.75 V8: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8
710 Nm
524 lb-ft
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
1,100 Nm
811 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8
1,900 kg
4,189 lb
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
2,685 kg
5,919 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
307 km/h191 mph
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
305 km/h
190 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V84.7 s
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V84.9 s

Although Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 Speed 6.75 V8 has more power, Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) GTS 3.8 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) GTS 3.8 V8 and Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 Speed 6.75 V8: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) GTS 3.8 V8 and Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 Speed 6.75 V8: 3.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8
279 hp/t
208 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
200 hp/t
149 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8
748 km
465 mi
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
658 km
409 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8
530 hp
395 kW
4.7 s
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
307 km/h191 mph
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
537 hp
400 kW
4.9 s
305 km/h
190 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8
Power
530 hp
395 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
307 km/h191 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Length
5,262 mm
207.2 in
Height
1,481 mm
58.3 in
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
Power
537 hp
400 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
443 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
5,575 mm
219.5 in
Height
1,521 mm
59.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8
Power
530 hp
395 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
307 km/h191 mph
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
Power
537 hp
400 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK

Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) GTS 3.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
4.7 s
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK
4.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8
279 hp/t
208 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
200 hp/t
149 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
Power
530 hp
395 kW
537 hp
400 kW
Torque
710 Nm
524 lb-ft
1,100 Nm
811 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.7 s
4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
307 km/h191 mph
305 km/h
190 mph
Lightness
1,900 kg
4,189 lb
2,685 kg
5,919 lb
Fuel consumption
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Length
5,262 mm
207.2 in
Height
1,481 mm
58.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
443 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
5,575 mm
219.5 in
Height
1,521 mm
59.9 in
Range score
748 km
465 mi
658 km
409 mi
CO2 score
250 g/km
342 g/km
Trunk score
530 L
18.7 cu ft
443 L
15.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
279 hp/t
208 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
200 hp/t
149 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMaserati Quattroporte VI (M156) GTS 3.8 V8Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 Speed 6.75 V8
Consumption10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK14.6 L/100 km16.1 mpg US19.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km18.72 LC100 km25.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.13 LC100 mi41.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal2,190 L579 US gal482 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,809 LC/year3,833 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) GTS 3.8 V8

  • Is 785 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 79 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 90 km (56 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 87 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 92 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) GTS 3.8 V8
Bentley Mulsanne II Speed 6.75 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

GTS 3.8 V8
Trofeo 3.8 V8 GDI
VS
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8vsMaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)Facelift 2016Trofeo 3.8 V8 GDI
Speed 6.75 V8
6.75 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8vsBentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
GTS 3.8 V8
4.7
VS
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8vsMaseratiQuattroporte Sport GT S4.7
Speed 6.75 V8
6.75 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8vsBentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
GTS 3.8 V8
4.7
VS
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8vsMaseratiQuattroporte S4.7
Speed 6.75 V8
S 4.0 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
GTS 3.8 V8
4.2 i V8 32V
VS
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8vsMaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V
Speed 6.75 V8
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur II4.0 V8
GTS 3.8 V8
3.2 V8 32V
VS
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8vsMaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V
Speed 6.75 V8
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8
GTS 3.8 V8
4.9
VS
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8vsMaseratiQuattroporte III4.9
Speed 6.75 V8
6.0 i W12 48V
VS
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8vsBentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V
Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) GTS 3.8 V8 vs Bentley Mulsanne II · Facelift 2016 Speed 6.75 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster