Bentley Flying Spur III
Car comparison
Bentley Flying Spur III Hybrid 2.9 V6vsZeekr 007 75 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonZeekr 007
75 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Flying Spur III Hybrid 2.9 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.3 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score76/100
- Best economy score0/100
Zeekr 007 75 kWh
- Most powerful422 hp315 kW
- Lightest2,150 kg4,740 lb
- Best power-to-weight196 hp/t146 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6 | Zeekr00775 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 416hp310kW | 422hp315kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,430kg5,357lb | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Gross weight | 3,030kg6,680lb | - |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 54.0s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 45.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.3s | 5.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.9s Calculated | 21.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.1s Calculated | 5.3s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 196hp/t146kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,894cc177cu in | - |
| Length | 5,316mm209in | 4,865mm192in |
| Width | 1,978mm78in | 1,900mm75in |
| Height | 1,483mm58in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,194mm126in | 2,928mm115in |
| Ground clearance | - | 141mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 351L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6 | Zeekr00775 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.1 s | 5.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.3 s | 5.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.9 s | 21.3 s |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.3 s | 11.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 194 km/h 121 mph | 171 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6 | 416 hp 310 kW |
| Zeekr00775 kWh | 422 hp 315 kW |
Zeekr 007 75 kWh has 6 hp more than Bentley Flying Spur III Hybrid 2.9 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Flying Spur III Hybrid 2.9 V6 and Zeekr 007 75 kWh: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| Zeekr00775 kWh | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6 | 2,430 kg 5,357 lb |
| Zeekr00775 kWh | 2,150 kg 4,740 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6 | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| Zeekr00775 kWh | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6 | 4.3 s |
| Zeekr00775 kWh | 5.6 s |
Although Zeekr 007 75 kWh has more power, Bentley Flying Spur III Hybrid 2.9 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Flying Spur III Hybrid 2.9 V6 and Zeekr 007 75 kWh: 1.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6 | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| Zeekr00775 kWh | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6 | 416 hp 310 kW | 4.3 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| Zeekr00775 kWh | 422 hp 315 kW | 5.6 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Zeekr00775 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6 | Zeekr00775 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 416 hp 310 kW | 422 hp 315 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.3 s | 5.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,430 kg 5,357 lb | 2,150 kg 4,740 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 351 L 12.4 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Flying Spur III Hybrid 2.9 V6
- Has 110 Nm more
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 60 km/h (37 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Zeekr 007 75 kWh
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 280 kg lighter
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























