Bentley Flying Spur II
Car comparison
Bentley Flying Spur II 6.0 W12vsMaybach Landaulet 6.0 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaybach Landaulet
6.0 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Flying Spur II 6.0 W12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed330 km/h205 mph Unrestricted320 km/h199 mph Restricted
- Most powerful616 hp459 kW
- Lightest2,475 kg5,456 lb
- Best power-to-weight249 hp/t186 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score83/100
- Best performance score87/100
- Best economy score67/100
Maybach Landaulet 6.0 V12
- Highest torque1,000 Nm738 lb-ft
- Best estimated range696 km433 mi
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12 | MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 616hp459kW | 612hp456kW |
| Torque | 800Nm590lb-ft | 1,000Nm738lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,475kg5,456lb | 2,855kg6,294lb |
| Gross weight | 2,972kg6,552lb | 3,380kg7,452lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.6s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated | 53.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 5.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.1s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 22.4L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 13.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 249hp/t186kW/t113hp/1000 lb Calculated | 214hp/t160kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 323Nm/t216lb-ft/ton Calculated | 350Nm/t234lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 612km380mi Calculated | 696km433mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,998cc366cu in | 5,980cc365cu in |
| Length | 5,295mm208in | - |
| Width | 1,976mm78in | - |
| Height | 1,488mm59in | - |
| Wheelbase | 3,065mm121in | - |
| Front track | 1,643mm65in | - |
| Rear track | 1,642mm65in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 590L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 110L |
| CO2 emissions | 343g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Flying Spur II 6.0 W12: Power / Torque
- Maybach Landaulet 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12 | 6,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12 | 4,800-5,100 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12 | MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 5.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.1 s | 15.6 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 49.3 s | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 13.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 202 km/h 126 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12 | 616 hp 459 kW |
| MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12 | 612 hp 456 kW |
Bentley Flying Spur II 6.0 W12 has 4 hp more than Maybach Landaulet 6.0 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Maybach Landaulet 6.0 V12 and Bentley Flying Spur II 6.0 W12: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
| MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12 | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12 | 2,475 kg 5,456 lb |
| MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12 | 2,855 kg 6,294 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12 | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
| MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12 | 4.6 s |
| MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12 | 5.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Flying Spur II 6.0 W12 and Maybach Landaulet 6.0 V12: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
| MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12 | 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Flying Spur II 6.0 W12 and Maybach Landaulet 6.0 V12: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12 | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12 | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12 | 612 km 380 mi |
| MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12 | 696 km 433 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12 | 616 hp 459 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
| MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12 | 612 hp 456 kW | 5.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12 |
| 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12 |
| 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Flying Spur II 6.0 W12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12 | 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12 | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
| MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12 | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12 | MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 616 hp 459 kW | 612 hp 456 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 5.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,475 kg 5,456 lb | 2,855 kg 6,294 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 612 km 380 mi | 696 km 433 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 343 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 590 L 20.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Flying Spur II 6.0 W12 | Maybach Landaulet 6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK | 15.8 L/100 km14.9 mpg US17.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.72 LC100 km | 27.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.40 LC100 mi | 44.50 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal | 2,370 L626 US gal521 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,859 LC/year | 4,148 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Flying Spur II 6.0 W12
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 380 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 65 km/h (40 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Maybach Landaulet 6.0 V12
- Has 200 Nm more
- Has 84 km (52 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























