Ford Mustang IV
Car comparison
Ford Mustang IV 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra RvsBentley Continental R 6.7 i V8 Mulliner
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental R
6.7 i V8 Mulliner
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Mustang IV 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,665 kg3,671 lb
- Best power-to-weight234 hp/t175 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.7 L/100 km22.0 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best economy score0/100
Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8 Mulliner
- Most powerful426 hp318 kW
- Highest torque875 Nm645 lb-ft
- Largest trunk350 L
- Best practicality score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 Mulliner |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 390hp291kW | 426hp318kW |
| Torque | 529Nm390lb-ft | 875Nm645lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 2,450kg5,401lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,850kg6,283lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.7s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 103.5s99% target: 270 km/h / 168 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.4s Calculated | 22.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 19.2L/100 km12.3mpg US14.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 234hp/t175kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 318Nm/t213lb-ft/ton Calculated | 357Nm/t239lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,601cc281cu in | 6,750cc412cu in |
| Length | 4,661mm184in | 5,350mm211in |
| Width | 1,857mm73in | 1,880mm74in |
| Height | 1,336mm53in | 1,462mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,573mm101in | 3,061mm121in |
| Front track | 1,530mm60in | 1,549mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,530mm60in | 1,581mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 310L | 350L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 100L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ford Mustang IV 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8 Mulliner: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | 6,000 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 Mulliner | 4,000 rpm | 2,100 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 Mulliner |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.4 s | 22.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 114 mph | 163 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | 390 hp 291 kW |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 Mulliner | 426 hp 318 kW |
Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8 Mulliner has 36 hp more than Ford Mustang IV 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Mustang IV 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R and Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8 Mulliner: 36 hp (27 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 Mulliner | 875 Nm 645 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 Mulliner | 2,450 kg 5,401 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 Mulliner | 273 km/h 170 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | 4.9 s |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 Mulliner | 6.0 s |
Although Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8 Mulliner has more power, Ford Mustang IV 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Mustang IV 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R and Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8 Mulliner: 1.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 Mulliner | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | 390 hp 291 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 Mulliner | 426 hp 318 kW | 6.0 s | 273 km/h 170 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 Mulliner |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 Mulliner | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 390 hp 291 kW | 426 hp 318 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft | 875 Nm 645 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 2,450 kg 5,401 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Mustang IV 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R
- Is 785 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 22 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
- Has 60 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8 Mulliner
- Has 36 hp more
- Has 346 Nm more
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























