Bentley Continental GTC II · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GTC II · Facelift 2015 V8 4.0vsBentley Continental R 6.7 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental R
6.7 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed301 km/h187 mph
- Most powerful507 hp378 kW
- Lightest2,470 kg5,445 lb
- Best power-to-weight205 hp/t153 kW/t4.9 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption15.9 L/100 km14.8 mpg US17.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score82/100
- Best economy score78/100
Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Largest trunk347 L
- Best practicality score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 507hp378kW | 408hp304kW |
| Torque | 660Nm487lb-ft | 800Nm590lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,470kg5,445lb | 2,610kg5,754lb |
| Gross weight | 2,900kg6,393lb | 2,980kg6,570lb |
| Top speed | 301 km/h 187 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 95.3s99% target: 298 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 99.7s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.7s Calculated | 27.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK | 28.1L/100 km8.4mpg US10.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 205hp/t153kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated | 156hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 267Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated | 307Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 826km513mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,993cc244cu in | 6,750cc412cu in |
| Length | 4,806mm189in | 5,240mm206in |
| Width | 1,944mm77in | 1,920mm76in |
| Height | 1,403mm55in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,746mm108in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,664mm66in | 1,550mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,655mm65in | 1,580mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 347L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 108L |
| CO2 emissions | 254g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 4,150 rpm | 2,150 rpm | 4,400 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.7 s | 27.1 s |
| Top speed | 301 km/h 187 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 178 km/h 111 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 507 hp 378 kW |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 408 hp 304 kW |
Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 has 99 hp more than Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8 and Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0: 99 hp (74 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 2,470 kg 5,445 lb |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 2,610 kg 5,754 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 301 km/h 187 mph |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 249 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 5.0 s |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 and Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8: 1.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 507 hp 378 kW | 5.0 s | 301 km/h 187 mph |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 408 hp 304 kW | 6.4 s | 249 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 507 hp 378 kW | 408 hp 304 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 301 km/h 187 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,470 kg 5,445 lb | 2,610 kg 5,754 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 826 km 513 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 254 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 347 L 12.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0
- Has 99 hp more
- Is 140 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 52 km/h (32 mph) higher top speed
- Has 49 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8
- Has 140 Nm more
- Has 87 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























