Car comparison

Bentley Continental GTC II V8 4.0vsMaserati GranCabrio I 4.7 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bentley Continental GTC II

V8 4.0

500 hp3993 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCabriolet / convertible2012-2015
VS

Maserati GranCabrio I

4.7 V8

450 hp4691 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2011-2012

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Bentley Continental GTC II V8 4.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    301 km/h
    187 mph
  • Most powerful
    500 hp
    373 kW
  • Highest torque
    660 Nm
    487 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.9 L/100 km
    21.6 mpg US
    25.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    15.8 L/100 km
    14.9 mpg US
    17.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.0 L/100 km
    29.4 mpg US
    35.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    254 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    826 km
    513 mi
  • Best overall score
    71/100
  • Best performance score
    82/100
  • Best economy score
    78/100
  • Best practicality score
    49/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBentleyContinental GTC IIV8 4.0MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8
Power
500hp373kW
450hp336kW
Torque
660Nm487lb-ft
510Nm376lb-ft
Curb weight
2,470kg5,445lb
1,980kg4,365lb
Gross weight
2,900kg6,393lb
2,350kg5,181lb
Top speed
301 km/h
187 mph
285 km/h
177 mph
To 99% top speed
95.8s99% target: 298 km/h / 185 mph
Calculated
80.9s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.0s
5.2s
0-200 km/h
16.7s
Calculated
17.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.8s
Calculated
4.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK
22.5L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.1s
Calculated
13.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
202hp/t151kW/t92hp/1000 lb
Calculated
227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
267Nm/t179lb-ft/ton
Calculated
258Nm/t172lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
826km513mi
Calculated
517km321mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,993cc244cu in
4,691cc286cu in
Length
4,806mm189in
4,881mm192in
Width
1,944mm77in
1,915mm75in
Height
1,403mm55in
1,353mm53in
Wheelbase
2,746mm108in
2,942mm116in
Front track
1,664mm66in
1,586mm62in
Rear track
1,655mm65in
1,590mm63in
Trunk volume-
173L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
90L
75L
CO2 emissions
254g/km
337g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Bentley Continental GTC II V8 4.0Maserati GranCabrio I 4.7 V8PowerTorque
  • Bentley Continental GTC II V8 4.0: Power / Torque
  • Maserati GranCabrio I 4.7 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 4.06,000 rpm1,700 rpm6,250 rpm
MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V87,000 rpm4,750 rpm7,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBentleyContinental GTC IIV8 4.0MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.8 s
4.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.0 s
5.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
16.7 s
17.2 s
Top speed
301 km/h
187 mph
285 km/h
177 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.7 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.6 s
8.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.0 s
11.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.1 s
13.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
178 km/h
110 mph
177 km/h
110 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 4.0
500 hp
373 kW
MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8
450 hp
336 kW

Bentley Continental GTC II V8 4.0 has 50 hp more than Maserati GranCabrio I 4.7 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Maserati GranCabrio I 4.7 V8 and Bentley Continental GTC II V8 4.0: 50 hp (37 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 4.0
660 Nm
487 lb-ft
MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8
510 Nm
376 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 4.0
2,470 kg
5,445 lb
MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8
1,980 kg
4,365 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 4.0
301 km/h
187 mph
MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8
285 km/h
177 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 4.05.0 s
MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V85.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GTC II V8 4.0 and Maserati GranCabrio I 4.7 V8: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 4.0
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8
14.5 L/100 km
16.2 mpg US
19.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Continental GTC II V8 4.0 and Maserati GranCabrio I 4.7 V8: 3.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 4.0
202 hp/t
151 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 4.0
826 km
513 mi
MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8
517 km
321 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 4.0
500 hp
373 kW
5.0 s
301 km/h
187 mph
MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8
450 hp
336 kW
5.2 s
285 km/h
177 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 4.0
Power
500 hp
373 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
301 km/h
187 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,806 mm
189.2 in
Height
1,403 mm
55.2 in
MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8
Power
450 hp
336 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
285 km/h
177 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
173 L
6.1 cu ft
Length
4,881 mm
192.2 in
Height
1,353 mm
53.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 4.0
Power
500 hp
373 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
301 km/h
187 mph
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8
Power
450 hp
336 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
285 km/h
177 mph
14.5 L/100 km
16.2 mpg US
19.5 mpg UK

Bentley Continental GTC II V8 4.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 4.0
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
5.0 s
MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8
14.5 L/100 km
16.2 mpg US
19.5 mpg UK
5.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 4.0
202 hp/t
151 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
14.5 L/100 km
16.2 mpg US
19.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBentleyContinental GTC IIV8 4.0MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8
Power
500 hp
373 kW
450 hp
336 kW
Torque
660 Nm
487 lb-ft
510 Nm
376 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.0 s
5.2 s
Top speed
301 km/h
187 mph
285 km/h
177 mph
Lightness
2,470 kg
5,445 lb
1,980 kg
4,365 lb
Fuel consumption
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
14.5 L/100 km
16.2 mpg US
19.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,806 mm
189.2 in
Height
1,403 mm
55.2 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
173 L
6.1 cu ft
Length
4,881 mm
192.2 in
Height
1,353 mm
53.3 in
Range score
826 km
513 mi
517 km
321 mi
CO2 score
254 g/km
337 g/km
Trunk score
-
173 L
6.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
202 hp/t
151 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBentley Continental GTC II V8 4.0Maserati GranCabrio I 4.7 V8
Consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.08 LC100 km25.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.70 LC100 mi40.84 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal2,175 L575 US gal478 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,861 LC/year3,806 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Bentley Continental GTC II V8 4.0

  • Has 50 hp more
  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 308 km (192 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 83 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest

Maserati GranCabrio I 4.7 V8

  • Is 490 kg lighter
  • Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bentley Continental GTC II V8 4.0
Maserati GranCabrio I 4.7 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

V8 4.0
V8 4.0
VS
BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 4.0vsBentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
4.7 V8
Sport 4.7 V8
VS
MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8vsMaseratiGranCabrio IFacelift 2018Sport 4.7 V8
V8 4.0
6.0 i W12 48V
VS
BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 4.0vsBentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V
4.7 V8
3.0 V6
VS
MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8vsMaseratiGranCabrio IIFacelift 20263.0 V6
V8 4.0
V8 4.0
VS
BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 4.0vsBentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0
4.7 V8
Trofeo 3.0 V6
VS
MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8vsMaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6
V8 4.0
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 4.0vsBentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8
4.7 V8
4.2 FSI V8
VS
MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8vsAUDIR8 Spyder (42)4.2 FSI V8
V8 4.0
V8 4.0
VS
BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 4.0vsBentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
4.7 V8
4.2 i V8 32V
VS
MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8vsMaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V
V8 4.0
6.0 i W12 48V
VS
BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 4.0vsBentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V
4.7 V8
650i
VS
MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8vsBMW6 Series Convertible (F12)650i
Bentley Continental GTC II V8 4.0 vs Maserati GranCabrio I 4.7 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster