Bentley Continental GTC II
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 · Stage 3vsBentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 · Stage 2vsBentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 · Stage 1vsBentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental GTC II
6.0 W12 (Stage 2)
Bentley Continental GTC II
6.0 W12 (Stage 1)
Bentley Continental GTC II
6.0 W12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 (Stage 3) 851 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Fastest top speed359 km/h223 mph
- Most powerful851 hp634 kW
- Highest torque1,085 Nm800 lb-ft
- Lightest2,495 kg5,501 lb
- Best power-to-weight341 hp/t254 kW/t2.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption23.0 L/100 km10.2 mpg US12.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28.0 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions347 g/km
- Best estimated range604 km375 mi
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score89/100
- Best economy score67/100
- Best practicality score49/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 3)851 hp | BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 2)737 hp | BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 1)669 hp | BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12567 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 851hp634kW+284 hp | 737hp550kW+170 hp | 669hp499kW+102 hp | 567hp423kW |
| Torque | 1,085Nm800lb-ft+385 Nm | 945Nm697lb-ft+245 Nm | 854Nm630lb-ft+154 Nm | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,495kg5,501lb | 2,495kg5,501lb | 2,495kg5,501lb | 2,495kg5,501lb |
| Gross weight | 2,900kg6,393lb | 2,900kg6,393lb | 2,900kg6,393lb | 2,900kg6,393lb |
| Top speed | 359 km/h 223 mph | 342 km/h 213 mph | 331 km/h 206 mph | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.7s99% target: 355 km/h / 221 mph-22.2 s Calculated | 77.5s99% target: 339 km/h / 210 mph-14.4 s Calculated | 82.7s99% target: 328 km/h / 204 mph-9.2 s Calculated | 91.9s99% target: 311 km/h / 193 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s-1.1 s | 4.0s-0.7 s | 4.2s-0.5 s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.1s-4.9 s Calculated | 11.6s-3.4 s Calculated | 12.8s-2.3 s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s-1.0 s Calculated | 3.8s-0.7 s Calculated | 4.0s-0.4 s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 23L/100 km10.2mpg US12.3mpg UK | 23L/100 km10.2mpg US12.3mpg UK | 23L/100 km10.2mpg US12.3mpg UK | 23L/100 km10.2mpg US12.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s-1.4 s Calculated | 11.8s-0.9 s Calculated | 12.1s-0.6 s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 341hp/t254kW/t155hp/1000 lb Calculated | 295hp/t220kW/t134hp/1000 lb Calculated | 268hp/t200kW/t122hp/1000 lb Calculated | 227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 435Nm/t291lb-ft/ton Calculated | 379Nm/t253lb-ft/ton Calculated | 342Nm/t229lb-ft/ton Calculated | 281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 604km375mi Calculated | 604km375mi Calculated | 604km375mi Calculated | 604km375mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,998cc366cu in | 5,998cc366cu in | 5,998cc366cu in | 5,998cc366cu in |
| Length | 4,806mm189in | 4,806mm189in | 4,806mm189in | 4,806mm189in |
| Width | 1,944mm77in | 1,944mm77in | 1,944mm77in | 1,944mm77in |
| Height | 1,403mm55in | 1,403mm55in | 1,403mm55in | 1,403mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,746mm108in | 2,746mm108in | 2,746mm108in | 2,746mm108in |
| Front track | 1,664mm66in | 1,664mm66in | 1,664mm66in | 1,664mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,655mm65in | 1,655mm65in | 1,655mm65in | 1,655mm65in |
| Doors | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 90L | 90L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | 347g/km | 347g/km | 347g/km | 347g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 (Stage 3) 851 hp: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 (Stage 2) 737 hp: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 (Stage 1) 669 hp: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 567 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 3)851 hp | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 2)737 hp | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 1)669 hp | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12567 hp | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 3)851 hp | BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 2)737 hp | BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 1)669 hp | BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12567 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 3.8 s | 4.0 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 4.0 s | 4.2 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.1 s | 11.6 s | 12.8 s | 15.0 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 31.7 s | 44.4 s | 61.9 s | - |
| Top speed | 359 km/h 223 mph | 342 km/h 213 mph | 331 km/h 206 mph | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.2 s | 5.4 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.5 s | 7.8 s | 8.0 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.6 s | 10.0 s | 10.3 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 11.8 s | 12.1 s | 12.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 213 km/h 132 mph | 202 km/h 125 mph | 195 km/h 121 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 3)851 hp | 851 hp 634 kW |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 2)737 hp | 737 hp 550 kW |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 1)669 hp | 669 hp 499 kW |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12567 hp | 567 hp 423 kW |
Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 (Stage 3) 851 hp has 284 hp more than Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 567 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 567 hp and Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 (Stage 3) 851 hp: 284 hp (211 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 3)851 hp | 1,085 Nm 800 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 2)737 hp | 945 Nm 697 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 1)669 hp | 854 Nm 630 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12567 hp | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 3)851 hp | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 2)737 hp | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 1)669 hp | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12567 hp | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 3)851 hp | 359 km/h 223 mph |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 2)737 hp | 342 km/h 213 mph |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 1)669 hp | 331 km/h 206 mph |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12567 hp | 314 km/h 195 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 3)851 hp | 3.7 s |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 2)737 hp | 4.0 s |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 1)669 hp | 4.2 s |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12567 hp | 4.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 (Stage 3) 851 hp and Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 567 hp: 1.1 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 (Stage 2) 737 hp and Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 (Stage 1) 669 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 3)851 hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 2)737 hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 1)669 hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12567 hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 3)851 hp | 341 hp/t 254 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 2)737 hp | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 1)669 hp | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12567 hp | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 3)851 hp | 604 km 375 mi |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 2)737 hp | 604 km 375 mi |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 1)669 hp | 604 km 375 mi |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12567 hp | 604 km 375 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 3)851 hp | 851 hp 634 kW | 3.7 s | 359 km/h 223 mph |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 2)737 hp | 737 hp 550 kW | 4.0 s | 342 km/h 213 mph |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 1)669 hp | 669 hp 499 kW | 4.2 s | 331 km/h 206 mph |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12567 hp | 567 hp 423 kW | 4.7 s | 314 km/h 195 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 3)851 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 2)737 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 1)669 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12567 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 3)851 hp |
| 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 2)737 hp |
| 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 1)669 hp |
| 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12567 hp |
| 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 (Stage 3) 851 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 3)851 hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 2)737 hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 1)669 hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12567 hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 3)851 hp | 341 hp/t 254 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 2)737 hp | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 1)669 hp | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12567 hp | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 3)851 hp | BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 2)737 hp | BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 (Stage 1)669 hp | BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12567 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 851 hp 634 kW | 737 hp 550 kW | 669 hp 499 kW | 567 hp 423 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,085 Nm 800 lb-ft | 945 Nm 697 lb-ft | 854 Nm 630 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 4.0 s | 4.2 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 359 km/h 223 mph | 342 km/h 213 mph | 331 km/h 206 mph | 314 km/h 195 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 604 km 375 mi | 604 km 375 mi | 604 km 375 mi | 604 km 375 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 347 g/km | 347 g/km | 347 g/km | 347 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 341 hp/t 254 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 (Stage 3) 851 hp | Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 (Stage 2) 737 hp | Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 (Stage 1) 669 hp | Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 567 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK | 14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK | 14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK | 14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.08 LC100 km | 26.08 LC100 km | 26.08 LC100 km | 26.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.96 LC100 mi | 41.96 LC100 mi | 41.96 LC100 mi | 41.96 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal | 2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal | 2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal | 2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,911 LC/year | 3,911 LC/year | 3,911 LC/year | 3,911 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 (Stage 3) 851 hp
- Has 113 hp more
- Has 140 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 45 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 (Stage 2) 737 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























