Bentley Continental GT
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GT Speed 6.0i W12 48V Twin TurbovsBentley Continental R 6.7 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental R
6.7 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GT Speed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed326 km/h203 mph
- Most powerful610 hp455 kW
- Lightest2,350 kg5,181 lb
- Best power-to-weight260 hp/t194 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption25.3 L/100 km9.3 mpg US11.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk370 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score87/100
- Best economy score62/100
Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Best practicality score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GTSpeed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo | BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 610hp455kW | 408hp304kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 800Nm590lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,350kg5,181lb | 2,610kg5,754lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,980kg6,570lb |
| Top speed | 326 km/h 203 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.7s99% target: 323 km/h / 201 mph Calculated | 100.5s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.6s Calculated | 27.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 25.3L/100 km9.3mpg US11.2mpg UK | 28.1L/100 km8.4mpg US10.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 260hp/t194kW/t118hp/1000 lb Calculated | 156hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 319Nm/t214lb-ft/ton Calculated | 307Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 542km337mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,998cc366cu in | 6,750cc412cu in |
| Length | 4,804mm189in | 5,240mm206in |
| Width | 1,916mm75in | 1,920mm76in |
| Height | 1,380mm54in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,745mm108in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,623mm64in | 1,550mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,607mm63in | 1,580mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 370L | 347L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 108L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GT Speed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTSpeed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo | 6,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 4,150 rpm | 2,150 rpm | 4,400 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GTSpeed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo | BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.6 s | 27.2 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 79.7 s | - |
| Top speed | 326 km/h 203 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 191 km/h 119 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTSpeed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo | 610 hp 455 kW |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 408 hp 304 kW |
Bentley Continental GT Speed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo has 202 hp more than Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8 and Bentley Continental GT Speed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo: 202 hp (151 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTSpeed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTSpeed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo | 2,350 kg 5,181 lb |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 2,610 kg 5,754 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTSpeed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo | 326 km/h 203 mph |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 249 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTSpeed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo | 4.5 s |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GT Speed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo and Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8: 1.9 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTSpeed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTSpeed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo | 610 hp 455 kW | 4.5 s | 326 km/h 203 mph |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | 408 hp 304 kW | 6.4 s | 249 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTSpeed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GTSpeed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo | BentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 610 hp 455 kW | 408 hp 304 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 326 km/h 203 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,350 kg 5,181 lb | 2,610 kg 5,754 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 16.6 L/100 km 14.2 mpg US 17.0 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 542 km 337 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | 347 L 12.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GT Speed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 16.6 L/100 km14.2 mpg US17 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 29.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 46.75 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,490 L658 US gal548 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,358 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GT Speed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo
- Has 202 hp more
- Is 260 kg lighter
- Is 1.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 77 km/h (48 mph) higher top speed
- Has 103 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 23 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Bentley Continental R 6.7 i V8
- Has 50 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























