Bentley Continental GT III
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GT III 4.0 V8vsBMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M4 (G82)
CSL 3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GT III 4.0 V8
- Fastest top speed318 km/h198 mph
- Most powerful550 hp410 kW
- Highest torque770 Nm568 lb-ft
- Best estimated range804 km499 mi
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score90/100
- Best practicality score50/100
BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Lightest1,625 kg3,583 lb
- Best power-to-weight338 hp/t252 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28.0 mpg UK
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best economy score80/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 | BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 550hp410kW |
| Torque | 770Nm568lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,165kg4,773lb | 1,625kg3,583lb |
| Gross weight | 2,725kg6,008lb | 1,970kg4,343lb |
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 307 km/h 191 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.1s99% target: 315 km/h / 196 mph Calculated | 52.6s99% target: 304 km/h / 189 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.0s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.4s Calculated | 10.7s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.8s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.9s Calculated | 11.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 254hp/t189kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated | 338hp/t252kW/t154hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 356Nm/t238lb-ft/ton Calculated | 400Nm/t268lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 804km499mi Calculated | 584km363mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,850mm191in | 4,794mm189in |
| Width | 2,187mm86in | 1,921mm76in |
| Height | 1,405mm55in | 1,386mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,851mm112in | 2,857mm112in |
| Front track | - | 1,623mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,609mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 113mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 358L | 440L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 59L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GT III 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,000-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,750-5,950 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 | BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.8 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.0 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.4 s | 10.7 s |
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 307 km/h 191 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 9.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.9 s | 11.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 196 km/h 122 mph | 207 km/h 129 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 550 hp 410 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft |
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 | 2,165 kg 4,773 lb |
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 307 km/h 191 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 | 4.0 s |
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 3.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0 and Bentley Continental GT III 4.0 V8: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0 and Bentley Continental GT III 4.0 V8: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 | 254 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 338 hp/t 252 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 | 804 km 499 mi |
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 584 km 363 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.0 s | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 550 hp 410 kW | 3.7 s | 307 km/h 191 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 |
| 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 | 254 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 338 hp/t 252 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 | BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 550 hp 410 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.0 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 307 km/h 191 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,165 kg 4,773 lb | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 804 km 499 mi | 584 km 363 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 358 L 12.6 cu ft | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 254 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 338 hp/t 252 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GT III 4.0 V8 | BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.60 LC100 km | 17.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,940 LC/year | 2,651 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GT III 4.0 V8
- Has 120 Nm more
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 219 km (136 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0
- Is 540 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 84 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 82 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























