Bentley Continental GTC III
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GTC III 6.0 TSI W12vsBentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental GT II
V8 S 4.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0
- Lightest2,295 kg5,060 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.4 L/100 km15.3 mpg US18.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions246 g/km
- Best estimated range857 km533 mi
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Bentley Continental GTC III 6.0 TSI W12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed333 km/h207 mph
- Most powerful635 hp474 kW
- Highest torque900 Nm664 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight263 hp/t196 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12 | BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 635hp474kW | 521hp389kW |
| Torque | 900Nm664lb-ft | 680Nm502lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,414kg5,322lb | 2,295kg5,060lb |
| Gross weight | 2,865kg6,316lb | 2,750kg6,063lb |
| Top speed | 333 km/h 207 mph | 309 km/h 192 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.0s99% target: 330 km/h / 205 mph Calculated | 83.7s99% target: 306 km/h / 190 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.4s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 263hp/t196kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated | 227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 373Nm/t249lb-ft/ton Calculated | 296Nm/t198lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 726km451mi Calculated | 857km533mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,950cc363cu in | 3,993cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,850mm191in | 4,806mm189in |
| Width | 1,954mm77in | 1,944mm77in |
| Height | 1,399mm55in | 1,404mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,851mm112in | 2,746mm108in |
| Front track | 1,672mm66in | 1,664mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,664mm66in | 1,655mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 235L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | 284g/km | 246g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GTC III 6.0 TSI W12: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12 | 6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12 | BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.4 s | 14.4 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 52.6 s | - |
| Top speed | 333 km/h 207 mph | 309 km/h 192 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 202 km/h 125 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12 | 635 hp 474 kW |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 | 521 hp 389 kW |
Bentley Continental GTC III 6.0 TSI W12 has 114 hp more than Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0 and Bentley Continental GTC III 6.0 TSI W12: 114 hp (85 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12 | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12 | 2,414 kg 5,322 lb |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 | 2,295 kg 5,060 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12 | 333 km/h 207 mph |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 | 309 km/h 192 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12 | 3.8 s |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 | 4.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GTC III 6.0 TSI W12 and Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0 and Bentley Continental GTC III 6.0 TSI W12: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12 | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12 | 726 km 451 mi |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 | 857 km 533 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12 | 635 hp 474 kW | 3.8 s | 333 km/h 207 mph |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 | 521 hp 389 kW | 4.5 s | 309 km/h 192 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12 |
| 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12 | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12 | BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 635 hp 474 kW | 521 hp 389 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 333 km/h 207 mph | 309 km/h 192 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,414 kg 5,322 lb | 2,295 kg 5,060 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 726 km 451 mi | 857 km 533 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 284 g/km | 246 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 235 L 8.3 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GTC III 6.0 TSI W12 | Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.70 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,255 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GTC III 6.0 TSI W12
- Has 114 hp more
- Has 220 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 24 km/h (15 mph) higher top speed
- Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0
- Is 119 kg lighter
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 131 km (82 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 38 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























