Bentley Continental GTC III
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GTC III 6.0 TSI W12vsBentley Continental GTC 6.0 i W12 48V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental GTC
6.0 i W12 48V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GTC III 6.0 TSI W12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed333 km/h207 mph
- Most powerful635 hp474 kW
- Highest torque900 Nm664 lb-ft
- Lightest2,414 kg5,322 lb
- Best power-to-weight263 hp/t196 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption17.5 L/100 km13.4 mpg US16.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk235 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score89/100
- Best economy score74/100
Bentley Continental GTC 6.0 i W12 48V
- Best practicality score49/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12 | BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 635hp474kW | 560hp418kW |
| Torque | 900Nm664lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,414kg5,322lb | 2,495kg5,501lb |
| Gross weight | 2,865kg6,316lb | 2,910kg6,415lb |
| Top speed | 333 km/h 207 mph | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.0s99% target: 330 km/h / 205 mph Calculated | 99.3s99% target: 311 km/h / 193 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 5.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.4s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK | 27.4L/100 km8.6mpg US10.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 13.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 263hp/t196kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated | 224hp/t167kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 373Nm/t249lb-ft/ton Calculated | 261Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 726km451mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,950cc363cu in | 5,998cc366cu in |
| Length | 4,850mm191in | 4,807mm189in |
| Width | 1,954mm77in | 1,918mm76in |
| Height | 1,399mm55in | 1,398mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,851mm112in | 2,745mm108in |
| Front track | 1,672mm66in | 1,623mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,664mm66in | 1,607mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 235L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 235L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | 284g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GTC III 6.0 TSI W12: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental GTC 6.0 i W12 48V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12 | 6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 6,100 rpm | 1,650 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12 | BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 5.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.4 s | 16.3 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 52.6 s | - |
| Top speed | 333 km/h 207 mph | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 13.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 202 km/h 125 mph | 179 km/h 111 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12 | 635 hp 474 kW |
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 560 hp 418 kW |
Bentley Continental GTC III 6.0 TSI W12 has 75 hp more than Bentley Continental GTC 6.0 i W12 48V.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental GTC 6.0 i W12 48V and Bentley Continental GTC III 6.0 TSI W12: 75 hp (56 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12 | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12 | 2,414 kg 5,322 lb |
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12 | 333 km/h 207 mph |
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 314 km/h 195 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12 | 3.8 s |
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 5.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GTC III 6.0 TSI W12 and Bentley Continental GTC 6.0 i W12 48V: 1.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12 | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12 | 635 hp 474 kW | 3.8 s | 333 km/h 207 mph |
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 560 hp 418 kW | 5.1 s | 314 km/h 195 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12 | BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 635 hp 474 kW | 560 hp 418 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 5.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 333 km/h 207 mph | 314 km/h 195 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,414 kg 5,322 lb | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 726 km 451 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 284 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 235 L 8.3 cu ft | 235 L 8.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GTC III 6.0 TSI W12 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,255 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GTC III 6.0 TSI W12
- Has 75 hp more
- Has 250 Nm more
- Is 81 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 39 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Bentley Continental GTC 6.0 i W12 48V
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























