Maserati GranTurismo I
Car comparison
Maserati GranTurismo I Sport 4.7 V8vsBentley Continental GT II V8 4.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental GT II
V8 4.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GT II V8 4.0
- Most powerful500 hp373 kW
- Highest torque660 Nm487 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions246 g/km
- Best estimated range857 km533 mi
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score83/100
- Best economy score79/100
Maserati GranTurismo I Sport 4.7 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed310 km/h193 mph Unrestricted300 km/h186 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,880 kg4,145 lb
- Best power-to-weight245 hp/t182 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
- Best practicality score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 | BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 460hp343kW | 500hp373kW |
| Torque | 520Nm384lb-ft | 660Nm487lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,880kg4,145lb | 2,295kg5,060lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,750kg6,063lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated | 303 km/h 188 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.4s99% target: 307 km/h / 191 mph Calculated | 88.1s99% target: 300 km/h / 186 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.4s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.5L/100 km15.2mpg US18.2mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 245hp/t182kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated | 218hp/t162kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 277Nm/t185lb-ft/ton Calculated | 288Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 555km345mi Calculated | 857km533mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,691cc286cu in | 3,993cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,881mm192in | 4,806mm189in |
| Width | 1,915mm75in | 1,944mm77in |
| Height | 1,353mm53in | 1,404mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,942mm116in | 2,746mm108in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,664mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,590mm63in | 1,655mm65in |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 86L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | 360g/km | 246g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati GranTurismo I Sport 4.7 V8: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental GT II V8 4.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 | 7,000 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 | BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.4 s | 15.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Likely limited | 303 km/h 188 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 | 460 hp 343 kW |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 500 hp 373 kW |
Bentley Continental GT II V8 4.0 has 40 hp more than Maserati GranTurismo I Sport 4.7 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati GranTurismo I Sport 4.7 V8 and Bentley Continental GT II V8 4.0: 40 hp (30 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 2,295 kg 5,060 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 303 km/h 188 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 | 4.7 s |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 4.8 s |
Although Bentley Continental GT II V8 4.0 has more power, Maserati GranTurismo I Sport 4.7 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati GranTurismo I Sport 4.7 V8 and Bentley Continental GT II V8 4.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 | 15.5 L/100 km 15.2 mpg US 18.2 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Continental GT II V8 4.0 and Maserati GranTurismo I Sport 4.7 V8: 5.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 | 245 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 | 555 km 345 mi |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 857 km 533 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 | 460 hp 343 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 500 hp 373 kW | 4.8 s | 303 km/h 188 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 |
| 15.5 L/100 km 15.2 mpg US 18.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Continental GT II V8 4.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 | 15.5 L/100 km 15.2 mpg US 18.2 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 | 245 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 15.5 L/100 km 15.2 mpg US 18.2 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 | BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 460 hp 343 kW | 500 hp 373 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | 303 km/h 188 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb | 2,295 kg 5,060 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.5 L/100 km 15.2 mpg US 18.2 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 555 km 345 mi | 857 km 533 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 360 g/km | 246 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 245 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati GranTurismo I Sport 4.7 V8 | Bentley Continental GT II V8 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.5 L/100 km15.2 mpg US18.2 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 27.13 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 43.65 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,325 L614 US gal511 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,069 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati GranTurismo I Sport 4.7 V8
- Is 415 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Bentley Continental GT II V8 4.0
- Has 40 hp more
- Has 140 Nm more
- Uses 5.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 302 km (188 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 114 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























