Bentley Continental GT
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin TurbovsBentley Continental GT II V8 4.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental GT II
V8 4.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Fastest top speed318 km/h198 mph
- Most powerful560 hp418 kW
- Best power-to-weight235 hp/t175 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Bentley Continental GT II V8 4.0
- Highest torque660 Nm487 lb-ft
- Lightest2,295 kg5,060 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range857 km533 mi
- Best economy score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 560hp418kW | 500hp373kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 660Nm487lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,385kg5,258lb | 2,295kg5,060lb |
| Gross weight | 2,800kg6,173lb | 2,750kg6,063lb |
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 303 km/h 188 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 91.7s99% target: 315 km/h / 196 mph Calculated | 88.1s99% target: 300 km/h / 186 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.0s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 235hp/t175kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated | 218hp/t162kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 273Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated | 288Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 526km327mi Calculated | 857km533mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,998cc366cu in | 3,993cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,807mm189in | 4,806mm189in |
| Width | 1,918mm76in | 1,944mm77in |
| Height | 1,390mm55in | 1,404mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,745mm108in | 2,746mm108in |
| Front track | 1,630mm64in | 1,664mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,615mm64in | 1,655mm65in |
| Max trunk volume | 370L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 246g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental GT II V8 4.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 6,100 rpm | 1,650 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.0 s | 15.6 s |
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 303 km/h 188 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 115 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 560 hp 418 kW |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 500 hp 373 kW |
Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo has 60 hp more than Bentley Continental GT II V8 4.0.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental GT II V8 4.0 and Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo: 60 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 2,385 kg 5,258 lb |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 2,295 kg 5,060 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 303 km/h 188 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 4.8 s |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 4.8 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Continental GT II V8 4.0 and Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo: 6.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 526 km 327 mi |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 857 km 533 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 560 hp 418 kW | 4.8 s | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 500 hp 373 kW | 4.8 s | 303 km/h 188 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo |
| 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Continental GT II V8 4.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 560 hp 418 kW | 500 hp 373 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 303 km/h 188 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,385 kg 5,258 lb | 2,295 kg 5,060 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 526 km 327 mi | 857 km 533 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 246 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | Bentley Continental GT II V8 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 17.1 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.5 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 29.93 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 48.16 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,565 L678 US gal564 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,489 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
- Has 60 hp more
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Bentley Continental GT II V8 4.0
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 90 kg lighter
- Uses 6.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 331 km (206 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























