Bentley Continental GTC II
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GTC II V8 S 4.0vsBentley Continental GT II V8 4.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental GT II
V8 4.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GT II V8 4.0
- Lightest2,295 kg5,060 lb
- Best power-to-weight218 hp/t162 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.4 L/100 km15.3 mpg US18.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions246 g/km
- Best estimated range857 km533 mi
- Best overall score73/100
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Bentley Continental GTC II V8 S 4.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed308 km/h191 mph
- Most powerful521 hp389 kW
- Highest torque680 Nm502 lb-ft
- Best performance score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 S 4.0 | BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 521hp389kW | 500hp373kW |
| Torque | 680Nm502lb-ft | 660Nm487lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,470kg5,445lb | 2,295kg5,060lb |
| Gross weight | 2,900kg6,393lb | 2,750kg6,063lb |
| Top speed | 308 km/h 191 mph | 303 km/h 188 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 91.6s99% target: 305 km/h / 189 mph Calculated | 87.4s99% target: 300 km/h / 186 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.4s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 211hp/t157kW/t96hp/1000 lb Calculated | 218hp/t162kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated | 288Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 826km513mi Calculated | 857km533mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,993cc244cu in | 3,993cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,806mm189in | 4,806mm189in |
| Width | 1,944mm77in | 1,944mm77in |
| Height | 1,403mm55in | 1,404mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,746mm108in | 2,746mm108in |
| Front track | 1,664mm66in | 1,664mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,655mm65in | 1,655mm65in |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | 254g/km | 246g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GTC II V8 S 4.0: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental GT II V8 4.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 S 4.0 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 S 4.0 | BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.4 s | 15.6 s |
| Top speed | 308 km/h 191 mph | 303 km/h 188 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 113 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 S 4.0 | 521 hp 389 kW |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 500 hp 373 kW |
Bentley Continental GTC II V8 S 4.0 has 21 hp more than Bentley Continental GT II V8 4.0.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental GT II V8 4.0 and Bentley Continental GTC II V8 S 4.0: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 S 4.0 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 S 4.0 | 2,470 kg 5,445 lb |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 2,295 kg 5,060 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 S 4.0 | 308 km/h 191 mph |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 303 km/h 188 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 S 4.0 | 4.7 s |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 4.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GTC II V8 S 4.0 and Bentley Continental GT II V8 4.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 S 4.0 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 S 4.0 | 211 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 S 4.0 | 826 km 513 mi |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 857 km 533 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 S 4.0 | 521 hp 389 kW | 4.7 s | 308 km/h 191 mph |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 500 hp 373 kW | 4.8 s | 303 km/h 188 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 S 4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 S 4.0 |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Continental GT II V8 4.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 S 4.0 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 S 4.0 | 211 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GTC IIV8 S 4.0 | BentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 521 hp 389 kW | 500 hp 373 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 308 km/h 191 mph | 303 km/h 188 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,470 kg 5,445 lb | 2,295 kg 5,060 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 826 km 513 mi | 857 km 533 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 254 g/km | 246 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 211 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GTC II V8 S 4.0 | Bentley Continental GT II V8 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GTC II V8 S 4.0
- Has 21 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Bentley Continental GT II V8 4.0
- Is 175 kg lighter
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 31 km (20 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 8 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























