Car comparison

Bentley Continental GTC II · Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12vsBentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bentley Continental GTC II · Facelift 2015

Supersport 6.0 W12

710 hp5998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCabriolet / convertible2017-2018
VS

Bentley Continental GT

6.0 W12 Twin Turbo

560 hp5998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2003-2010

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12

  • Fastest top speed
    330 km/h
    205 mph
  • Most powerful
    710 hp
    529 kW
  • Highest torque
    1,017 Nm
    750 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    289 hp/t
    216 kW/t
    3.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    15.9 L/100 km
    14.8 mpg US
    17.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    566 km
    352 mi
  • Best economy score
    64/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
Power
710hp529kW
560hp418kW
Torque
1,017Nm750lb-ft
650Nm479lb-ft
Curb weight
2,455kg5,412lb
2,385kg5,258lb
Gross weight
2,900kg6,393lb
2,800kg6,173lb
Top speed
330 km/h
205 mph
318 km/h
198 mph
To 99% top speed
148.3s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph
Calculated
91.7s99% target: 315 km/h / 196 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.0s
4.8s
0-200 km/h
23.7s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.6s
Calculated
4.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK
17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
24.4L/100 km9.6mpg US11.6mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
12.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
289hp/t216kW/t131hp/1000 lb
Calculated
235hp/t175kW/t107hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
414Nm/t277lb-ft/ton
Calculated
273Nm/t182lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
566km352mi
Calculated
526km327mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,998cc366cu in
5,998cc366cu in
Length
4,818mm190in
4,807mm189in
Width
1,947mm77in
1,918mm76in
Height
1,390mm55in
1,390mm55in
Wheelbase
2,746mm108in
2,745mm108in
Front track
1,664mm66in
1,630mm64in
Rear track
1,655mm65in
1,615mm64in
Trunk volume
260L
-
Max trunk volume-
370L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
90L
90L
CO2 emissions
362g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin TurboPowerTorque
  • Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12: Power / Torque
  • Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W125,900 rpm2,050-4,500 rpm6,150 rpm
BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo6,100 rpm1,650 rpm6,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.6 s
4.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.0 s
4.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.7 s
15.0 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
115.5 s
-
Top speed
330 km/h
205 mph
318 km/h
198 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
5.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
8.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
10.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
12.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
157 km/h
98 mph
184 km/h
115 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12 has 150 hp more than Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo and Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12: 150 hp (112 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12 has more power, Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo and Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12: 3.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
15.9 L/100 km
14.8 mpg US
17.8 mpg UK
BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
17.1 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12 and Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
289 hp/t
216 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
235 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
710 hp
529 kW
8.0 s
330 km/h
205 mph
BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
560 hp
418 kW
4.8 s
318 km/h
198 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
Power
710 hp
529 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
330 km/h
205 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
260 L
9.2 cu ft
Length
4,818 mm
189.7 in
Height
1,390 mm
54.7 in
BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
Power
560 hp
418 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
318 km/h
198 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
370 L
13.1 cu ft
Length
4,807 mm
189.3 in
Height
1,390 mm
54.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
Power
710 hp
529 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
330 km/h
205 mph
15.9 L/100 km
14.8 mpg US
17.8 mpg UK
BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
Power
560 hp
418 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
318 km/h
198 mph
17.1 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.5 mpg UK

Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
15.9 L/100 km
14.8 mpg US
17.8 mpg UK
8.0 s
BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
17.1 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.5 mpg UK
4.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
289 hp/t
216 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
15.9 L/100 km
14.8 mpg US
17.8 mpg UK
BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
235 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
17.1 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
Power
710 hp
529 kW
560 hp
418 kW
Torque
1,017 Nm
750 lb-ft
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.0 s
4.8 s
Top speed
330 km/h
205 mph
318 km/h
198 mph
Lightness
2,455 kg
5,412 lb
2,385 kg
5,258 lb
Fuel consumption
15.9 L/100 km
14.8 mpg US
17.8 mpg UK
17.1 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
260 L
9.2 cu ft
Length
4,818 mm
189.7 in
Height
1,390 mm
54.7 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
370 L
13.1 cu ft
Length
4,807 mm
189.3 in
Height
1,390 mm
54.7 in
Range score
566 km
352 mi
526 km
327 mi
CO2 score
362 g/km
-
Trunk score
260 L
9.2 cu ft
370 L
13.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
289 hp/t
216 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
235 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
Consumption15.9 L/100 km14.8 mpg US17.8 mpg UK17.1 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km27.83 LC100 km29.93 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi44.78 LC100 mi48.16 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,385 L630 US gal525 UK gal2,565 L678 US gal564 UK gal
Annual fuel cost4,174 LC/year4,489 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12

  • Has 150 hp more
  • Has 367 Nm more
  • Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 54 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 40 km (25 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo

  • Is 70 kg lighter
  • Is 3.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 110 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bentley Continental GTC II Supersport 6.0 W12
Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Bentley Continental GTC II · Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12 vs Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster