Bentley Continental GT III
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12vsBentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental GT
6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Fastest top speed333 km/h207 mph
- Most powerful635 hp474 kW
- Highest torque900 Nm664 lb-ft
- Lightest2,244 kg4,947 lb
- Best power-to-weight283 hp/t211 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range744 km462 mi
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score90/100
- Best economy score74/100
Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
- Largest trunk370 L
- Best practicality score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12 | BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 635hp474kW | 560hp418kW |
| Torque | 900Nm664lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,244kg4,947lb | 2,385kg5,258lb |
| Gross weight | 2,725kg6,008lb | 2,800kg6,173lb |
| Top speed | 333 km/h 207 mph | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.8s99% target: 330 km/h / 205 mph Calculated | 91.7s99% target: 315 km/h / 196 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.8s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.7L/100 km14.1mpg US16.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.5s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 283hp/t211kW/t128hp/1000 lb Calculated | 235hp/t175kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 401Nm/t268lb-ft/ton Calculated | 273Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 744km462mi Calculated | 526km327mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,950cc363cu in | 5,998cc366cu in |
| Length | 4,850mm191in | 4,807mm189in |
| Width | 1,954mm77in | 1,918mm76in |
| Height | 1,405mm55in | 1,390mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,851mm112in | 2,745mm108in |
| Front track | 1,672mm66in | 1,630mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,664mm66in | 1,615mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 358L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 370L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12 | 6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 6,100 rpm | 1,650 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12 | BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.8 s | 15.0 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 48.0 s | - |
| Top speed | 333 km/h 207 mph | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.5 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 206 km/h 128 mph | 184 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12 | 635 hp 474 kW |
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 560 hp 418 kW |
Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12 has 75 hp more than Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo and Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12: 75 hp (56 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12 | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12 | 2,244 kg 4,947 lb |
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 2,385 kg 5,258 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12 | 333 km/h 207 mph |
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 318 km/h 198 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12 | 3.7 s |
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 4.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12 and Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12 and Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo: 5.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12 | 283 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12 | 744 km 462 mi |
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 526 km 327 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12 | 635 hp 474 kW | 3.7 s | 333 km/h 207 mph |
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 560 hp 418 kW | 4.8 s | 318 km/h 198 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12 |
| 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo |
| 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12 | 283 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12 | BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 635 hp 474 kW | 560 hp 418 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 333 km/h 207 mph | 318 km/h 198 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,244 kg 4,947 lb | 2,385 kg 5,258 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 744 km 462 mi | 526 km 327 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 358 L 12.6 cu ft | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 283 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12 | Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK | 17.1 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.18 LC100 km | 29.93 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi | 48.16 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal | 2,565 L678 US gal564 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,176 LC/year | 4,489 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12
- Has 75 hp more
- Has 250 Nm more
- Is 141 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 5.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 48 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 217 km (135 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
- Has 12 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























