Car comparison

Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12vsBentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bentley Continental GT III

6.0 TSI W12

635 hp5950 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2018-2021
VS

Bentley Continental Flying Spur

6.0 i W12 48V

560 hp5998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2005-2013

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    333 km/h
    207 mph
  • Most powerful
    635 hp
    474 kW
  • Highest torque
    900 Nm
    664 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,244 kg
    4,947 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    283 hp/t
    211 kW/t
    3.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    16.7 L/100 km
    14.1 mpg US
    16.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.5 L/100 km
    24.8 mpg US
    29.7 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    90/100
  • Best economy score
    74/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V
Power
635hp474kW
560hp418kW
Torque
900Nm664lb-ft
650Nm479lb-ft
Curb weight
2,244kg4,947lb
2,475kg5,456lb
Gross weight
2,725kg6,008lb
2,980kg6,570lb
Top speed
333 km/h
207 mph
312 km/h
194 mph
To 99% top speed
67.8s99% target: 330 km/h / 205 mph
Calculated
66.2s99% target: 309 km/h / 192 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.7s
5.2s
0-200 km/h
10.8s
Calculated
14.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.5s
Calculated
5.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
16.7L/100 km14.1mpg US16.9mpg UK
26.4L/100 km8.9mpg US10.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.5s
Calculated
13.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
283hp/t211kW/t128hp/1000 lb
Calculated
226hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
401Nm/t268lb-ft/ton
Calculated
263Nm/t176lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
744km462mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
5,950cc363cu in
5,998cc366cu in
Length
4,850mm191in
5,307mm209in
Width
1,954mm77in
1,937mm76in
Height
1,405mm55in
1,479mm58in
Wheelbase
2,851mm112in
3,065mm121in
Front track
1,672mm66in
1,623mm64in
Rear track
1,664mm66in
1,607mm63in
Trunk volume
358L
475L
Doors
2
4
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
90L
90L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48VPowerTorque
  • Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12: Power / Torque
  • Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W126,000 rpm1,350-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm
BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V6,100 rpm1,650 rpm6,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.5 s
5.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.7 s
5.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
10.8 s
14.2 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
48.0 s
-
Top speed
333 km/h
207 mph
312 km/h
194 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
5.1 s
6.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.6 s
8.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.7 s
11.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.5 s
13.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
206 km/h
128 mph
191 km/h
118 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12 has 75 hp more than Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V.

The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V and Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12: 75 hp (56 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12
900 Nm
664 lb-ft
BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V
650 Nm
479 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12
2,244 kg
4,947 lb
BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V
2,475 kg
5,456 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12
333 km/h
207 mph
BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V
312 km/h
194 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12 and Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V: 1.5 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12
283 hp/t
211 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V
226 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12
635 hp
474 kW
3.7 s
333 km/h
207 mph
BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V
560 hp
418 kW
5.2 s
312 km/h
194 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12
Power
635 hp
474 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
333 km/h
207 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
4,850 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,405 mm
55.3 in
BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V
Power
560 hp
418 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
312 km/h
194 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
475 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
5,307 mm
208.9 in
Height
1,479 mm
58.2 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V
Power
635 hp
474 kW
560 hp
418 kW
Torque
900 Nm
664 lb-ft
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.7 s
5.2 s
Top speed
333 km/h
207 mph
312 km/h
194 mph
Lightness
2,244 kg
4,947 lb
2,475 kg
5,456 lb
Fuel consumption
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
4,850 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,405 mm
55.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
475 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
5,307 mm
208.9 in
Height
1,479 mm
58.2 in
Range score
744 km
462 mi
-
Trunk score
358 L
12.6 cu ft
475 L
16.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
283 hp/t
211 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
226 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12
Consumption12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.18 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.08 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,176 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12

  • Has 75 hp more
  • Has 250 Nm more
  • Is 231 kg lighter
  • Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 57 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12
Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12 vs Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V - car comparison - FastVsFaster