Bentley Bentayga
Car comparison
Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8vsLand Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Velar
SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition 5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph
- Most powerful550 hp410 kW
- Highest torque770 Nm568 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range746 km463 mi
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score76/100
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition 5.0 V8
- Lightest2,160 kg4,762 lb
- Best power-to-weight255 hp/t190 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk834 L
- Best overall score85/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | Land RoverRange Rover VelarSVAutobiography Dynamic Edition 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 550hp410kW |
| Torque | 770Nm568lb-ft | 680Nm502lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,428kg5,353lb | 2,160kg4,762lb |
| Gross weight | 3,250kg7,165lb | - |
| Top speed | 290 km/h 180 mph | 274 km/h 170 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.1s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 58.3s99% target: 271 km/h / 169 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.5s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated | 255hp/t190kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 317Nm/t212lb-ft/ton Calculated | 315Nm/t211lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 746km463mi Calculated | 695km432mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | 4,999cc305cu in |
| Length | 5,140mm202in | 4,806mm189in |
| Width | 1,998mm79in | - |
| Height | 1,742mm69in | 1,676mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,995mm118in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | - | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | - | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 205mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 215L | 834L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,774L | 1,705L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 82L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 270g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 1,960-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarSVAutobiography Dynamic Edition 5.0 V8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 2,500-5,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | Land RoverRange Rover VelarSVAutobiography Dynamic Edition 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.5 s | 14.5 s |
| Top speed | 290 km/h 180 mph | 274 km/h 170 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 186 km/h 116 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarSVAutobiography Dynamic Edition 5.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarSVAutobiography Dynamic Edition 5.0 V8 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 2,428 kg 5,353 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarSVAutobiography Dynamic Edition 5.0 V8 | 2,160 kg 4,762 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 290 km/h 180 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarSVAutobiography Dynamic Edition 5.0 V8 | 274 km/h 170 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 4.5 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarSVAutobiography Dynamic Edition 5.0 V8 | 4.5 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarSVAutobiography Dynamic Edition 5.0 V8 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarSVAutobiography Dynamic Edition 5.0 V8 | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 746 km 463 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarSVAutobiography Dynamic Edition 5.0 V8 | 695 km 432 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.5 s | 290 km/h 180 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarSVAutobiography Dynamic Edition 5.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.5 s | 274 km/h 170 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarSVAutobiography Dynamic Edition 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarSVAutobiography Dynamic Edition 5.0 V8 |
| 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarSVAutobiography Dynamic Edition 5.0 V8 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarSVAutobiography Dynamic Edition 5.0 V8 | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | Land RoverRange Rover VelarSVAutobiography Dynamic Edition 5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 550 hp 410 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 290 km/h 180 mph | 274 km/h 170 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,428 kg 5,353 lb | 2,160 kg 4,762 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 746 km 463 mi | 695 km 432 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 270 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 215 L 7.6 cu ft | 834 L 29.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8 | Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.95 LC100 km | 20.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,993 LC/year | 3,098 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8
- Has 90 Nm more
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 51 km (32 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition 5.0 V8
- Is 268 kg lighter
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 619 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























