Bentley Bentayga
Car comparison
Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8vsMercedes-Benz GLS (X166) AMG GLS 63
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLS (X166)
AMG GLS 63
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph
- Highest torque770 Nm568 lb-ft
- Lightest2,428 kg5,353 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.6 L/100 km15.1 mpg US18.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score76/100
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) AMG GLS 63
- Most powerful585 hp436 kW
- Best power-to-weight234 hp/t174 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Best estimated range813 km505 mi
- Largest trunk680 L
- Best overall score85/100
- Best practicality score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 585hp436kW |
| Torque | 770Nm568lb-ft | 760Nm561lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,428kg5,353lb | 2,505kg5,523lb |
| Gross weight | 3,250kg7,165lb | 3,290kg7,253lb |
| Top speed | 290 km/h 180 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.1s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 60.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.5s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK | 15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated | 234hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 317Nm/t212lb-ft/ton Calculated | 303Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 746km463mi Calculated | 813km505mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | 5,461cc333cu in |
| Length | 5,140mm202in | 5,130mm202in |
| Width | 1,998mm79in | 1,934mm76in |
| Height | 1,742mm69in | 1,850mm73in |
| Wheelbase | 2,995mm118in | 3,075mm121in |
| Front track | - | 1,655mm65in |
| Rear track | - | 1,675mm66in |
| Trunk volume | 215L | 680L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,774L | 2,300L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 100L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 288g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) AMG GLS 63: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 1,960-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 | 5,500 rpm | 1,750-5,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.5 s | 16.3 s |
| Top speed | 290 km/h 180 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 12.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 186 km/h 116 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 | 585 hp 436 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) AMG GLS 63 has 35 hp more than Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) AMG GLS 63: 35 hp (26 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 | 760 Nm 561 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 2,428 kg 5,353 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 | 2,505 kg 5,523 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 290 km/h 180 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 4.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 | 4.6 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) AMG GLS 63 has more power, Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) AMG GLS 63: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) AMG GLS 63: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 746 km 463 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 | 813 km 505 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.5 s | 290 km/h 180 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 | 585 hp 436 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 |
| 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 585 hp 436 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft | 760 Nm 561 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 290 km/h 180 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,428 kg 5,353 lb | 2,505 kg 5,523 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 746 km 463 mi | 813 km 505 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 288 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 215 L 7.6 cu ft | 680 L 24.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8 | Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) AMG GLS 63 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.95 LC100 km | 21.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,993 LC/year | 3,229 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 77 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) AMG GLS 63
- Has 35 hp more
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 67 km (42 mi) more estimated range
- Has 465 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























