Bentley Bentayga
Car comparison
Bentley Bentayga 4.0 diesel V8vsPorsche Cayenne III GTS 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Cayenne III
GTS 4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Bentayga 4.0 diesel V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph
- Highest torque900 Nm664 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions210 g/km
- Best estimated range1,076 km669 mi
- Best performance score78/100
- Best economy score86/100
Porsche Cayenne III GTS 4.0 V8
- Most powerful460 hp343 kW
- Lightest2,145 kg4,729 lb
- Best power-to-weight214 hp/t160 kW/t4.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk772 L
- Best overall score82/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 | PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 435hp324kW | 460hp343kW |
| Torque | 900Nm664lb-ft | 620Nm457lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,505kg5,523lb | 2,145kg4,729lb |
| Gross weight | 3,250kg7,165lb | 2,860kg6,305lb |
| Top speed | 270 km/h 168 mph | 270 km/h 168 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.9s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 80.9s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.4s Calculated | 17.9s |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 174hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated | 214hp/t160kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 359Nm/t240lb-ft/ton Calculated | 289Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,076km669mi Calculated | 789km491mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | 3,996cc244cu in |
| Length | 5,140mm202in | 4,929mm194in |
| Width | 1,998mm79in | 1,983mm78in |
| Height | 1,722mm68in | 1,676mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,995mm118in | 2,895mm114in |
| Front track | - | 1,682mm66in |
| Rear track | - | 1,665mm66in |
| Trunk volume | 431L | 772L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,774L | 1,708L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | 210g/km | 260g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Bentayga 4.0 diesel V8: Power / Torque
- Porsche Cayenne III GTS 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 | 3,750-5,000 rpm | 1,000-3,250 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 1,800-4,500 rpm | 6,800 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 | PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.4 s | 17.9 s |
| Top speed | 270 km/h 168 mph | 270 km/h 168 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 110 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 | 435 hp 324 kW |
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 460 hp 343 kW |
Porsche Cayenne III GTS 4.0 V8 has 25 hp more than Bentley Bentayga 4.0 diesel V8.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Bentayga 4.0 diesel V8 and Porsche Cayenne III GTS 4.0 V8: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft |
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 | 2,505 kg 5,523 lb |
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 2,145 kg 4,729 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 | 270 km/h 168 mph |
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 270 km/h 168 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 | 4.8 s |
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 4.8 s |
Although Porsche Cayenne III GTS 4.0 V8 has more power, Bentley Bentayga 4.0 diesel V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Bentayga 4.0 diesel V8 and Porsche Cayenne III GTS 4.0 V8: 3.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 | 174 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 | 1,076 km 669 mi |
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 789 km 491 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 | 435 hp 324 kW | 4.8 s | 270 km/h 168 mph |
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 460 hp 343 kW | 4.8 s | 270 km/h 168 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Bentayga 4.0 diesel V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 | 174 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyBentayga4.0 diesel V8 | PorscheCayenne IIIGTS 4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 435 hp 324 kW | 460 hp 343 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 270 km/h 168 mph | 270 km/h 168 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,505 kg 5,523 lb | 2,145 kg 4,729 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,076 km 669 mi | 789 km 491 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 210 g/km | 260 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 431 L 15.2 cu ft | 772 L 27.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 174 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Bentayga 4.0 diesel V8 | Porsche Cayenne III GTS 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 19.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 2,993 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Bentayga 4.0 diesel V8
- Has 280 Nm more
- Uses 3.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 286 km (178 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 50 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Porsche Cayenne III GTS 4.0 V8
- Has 25 hp more
- Is 360 kg lighter
- Has 41 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 341 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























