BMW M3 Convertible (E46)
Car comparison
BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24VvsBentley Azure 6.7 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Azure
6.7 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,655 kg3,649 lb
- Best power-to-weight207 hp/t155 kW/t4.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8
- Most powerful426 hp318 kW
- Highest torque875 Nm645 lb-ft
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score71/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 343hp256kW | 426hp318kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 875Nm645lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,655kg3,649lb | 2,610kg5,754lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 2,980kg6,570lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 97.3s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.0s Calculated | 26.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 207hp/t155kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated | 163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 335Nm/t224lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 521km324mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,246cc198cu in | 6,750cc412cu in |
| Length | 4,492mm177in | 5,350mm211in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,878mm74in |
| Height | 1,363mm54in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,731mm108in | 3,061mm121in |
| Front track | 1,508mm59in | 1,549mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,525mm60in | 1,549mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 300L | 193L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 108L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V: Power / Torque
- Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 7,900 rpm | 4,900 rpm | 8,150 rpm |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 4,000 rpm | 2,100 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.0 s | 26.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 170 km/h 105 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 343 hp 256 kW |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 426 hp 318 kW |
Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8 has 83 hp more than BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V and Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8: 83 hp (62 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 875 Nm 645 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 2,610 kg 5,754 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 249 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 5.5 s |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 6.2 s |
Although Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8 has more power, BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V and Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 343 hp 256 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 426 hp 318 kW | 6.2 s | 249 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 343 hp 256 kW | 426 hp 318 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 875 Nm 645 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | 2,610 kg 5,754 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 521 km 324 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | 193 L 6.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.18 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,176 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V
- Is 955 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 44 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 107 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8
- Has 83 hp more
- Has 510 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























