Bentley Arnage R
Car comparison
Bentley Arnage R 6.7 i V8 16V RLvsVolkswagen Phaeton 4.2 i V8 40V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Phaeton
4.2 i V8 40V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Arnage R 6.7 i V8 16V RL
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful405 hp302 kW
- Highest torque835 Nm616 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Volkswagen Phaeton 4.2 i V8 40V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Lightest2,205 kg4,861 lb
- Lowest city consumption18.9 L/100 km12.4 mpg US14.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best economy score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V RL | VolkswagenPhaeton4.2 i V8 40V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 405hp302kW | 335hp250kW |
| Torque | 835Nm616lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,655kg5,853lb | 2,205kg4,861lb |
| Gross weight | 3,040kg6,702lb | 2,730kg6,019lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 84.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 76.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.0s Calculated | 22.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 30.7L/100 km7.7mpg US9.2mpg UK | 18.9L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 315Nm/t210lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 692km430mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,750cc412cu in | 4,172cc255cu in |
| Length | 5,640mm222in | 5,055mm199in |
| Width | 1,932mm76in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,515mm60in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,366mm133in | 2,881mm113in |
| Front track | 1,602mm63in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,602mm63in | 1,612mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 374L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Arnage R 6.7 i V8 16V RL: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Phaeton 4.2 i V8 40V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V RL | 4,000 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenPhaeton4.2 i V8 40V | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V RL | VolkswagenPhaeton4.2 i V8 40V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.0 s | 22.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V RL | 405 hp 302 kW |
| VolkswagenPhaeton4.2 i V8 40V | 335 hp 250 kW |
Bentley Arnage R 6.7 i V8 16V RL has 70 hp more than Volkswagen Phaeton 4.2 i V8 40V.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Phaeton 4.2 i V8 40V and Bentley Arnage R 6.7 i V8 16V RL: 70 hp (52 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V RL | 835 Nm 616 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenPhaeton4.2 i V8 40V | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V RL | 2,655 kg 5,853 lb |
| VolkswagenPhaeton4.2 i V8 40V | 2,205 kg 4,861 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V RL | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolkswagenPhaeton4.2 i V8 40V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V RL | 7.0 s |
| VolkswagenPhaeton4.2 i V8 40V | 6.9 s |
Although Bentley Arnage R 6.7 i V8 16V RL has more power, Volkswagen Phaeton 4.2 i V8 40V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Phaeton 4.2 i V8 40V and Bentley Arnage R 6.7 i V8 16V RL: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V RL | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenPhaeton4.2 i V8 40V | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V RL | 405 hp 302 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolkswagenPhaeton4.2 i V8 40V | 335 hp 250 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V RL |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenPhaeton4.2 i V8 40V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V RL | VolkswagenPhaeton4.2 i V8 40V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 405 hp 302 kW | 335 hp 250 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 835 Nm 616 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,655 kg 5,853 lb | 2,205 kg 4,861 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 692 km 430 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 374 L 13.2 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Phaeton 4.2 i V8 40V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 13 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.61 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,950 L515 US gal429 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,413 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Arnage R 6.7 i V8 16V RL
- Has 70 hp more
- Has 405 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Phaeton 4.2 i V8 40V
- Is 450 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 126 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























