Cadillac CTS I
Car comparison
Cadillac CTS I V 5.7 i V8vsBentley Arnage R 6.7 i V8 16V RL
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Arnage R
6.7 i V8 16V RL
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac CTS I V 5.7 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful405 hp302 kW
- Lightest1,745 kg3,847 lb
- Best power-to-weight232 hp/t173 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption18.0 L/100 km13.1 mpg US15.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score75/100
- Best economy score0/100
Bentley Arnage R 6.7 i V8 16V RL
- Highest torque835 Nm616 lb-ft
- Largest trunk374 L
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V RL |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 405hp302kW | 405hp302kW |
| Torque | 536Nm395lb-ft | 835Nm616lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 2,655kg5,853lb |
| Gross weight | - | 3,040kg6,702lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 46.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 84.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.9s Calculated | 23.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption city | 18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK | 30.7L/100 km7.7mpg US9.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 232hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 307Nm/t206lb-ft/ton Calculated | 315Nm/t210lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,665cc346cu in | 6,750cc412cu in |
| Length | 4,865mm192in | 5,640mm222in |
| Width | 1,793mm71in | 1,932mm76in |
| Height | 1,455mm57in | 1,515mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,880mm113in | 3,366mm133in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | 1,602mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 360L | 374L |
| Max trunk volume | 430L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 100L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac CTS I V 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
- Bentley Arnage R 6.7 i V8 16V RL: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | 6,000 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V RL | 4,000 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V RL |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.9 s | 23.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 190 km/h 118 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | 405 hp 302 kW |
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V RL | 405 hp 302 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | 536 Nm 395 lb-ft |
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V RL | 835 Nm 616 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V RL | 2,655 kg 5,853 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V RL | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | 4.6 s |
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V RL | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CTS I V 5.7 i V8 and Bentley Arnage R 6.7 i V8 16V RL: 2.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V RL | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | 405 hp 302 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V RL | 405 hp 302 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V RL |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V RL | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 405 hp 302 kW | 405 hp 302 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 536 Nm 395 lb-ft | 835 Nm 616 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 2,655 kg 5,853 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | 374 L 13.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac CTS I V 5.7 i V8
- Is 910 kg lighter
- Is 2.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 80 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Bentley Arnage R 6.7 i V8 16V RL
- Has 299 Nm more
- Has 14 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























