Jaguar XJ (X350)
Car comparison
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32VvsBentley Arnage R 6.7 i V8 16V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Arnage R
6.7 i V8 16V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,665 kg3,671 lb
- Best power-to-weight240 hp/t179 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption18.6 L/100 km12.6 mpg US15.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range691 km429 mi
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Bentley Arnage R 6.7 i V8 16V
- Most powerful405 hp302 kW
- Highest torque835 Nm616 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 405hp302kW |
| Torque | 541Nm399lb-ft | 835Nm616lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 2,585kg5,699lb |
| Gross weight | 2,250kg4,960lb | 2,970kg6,548lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 51.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 74.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.8s Calculated | 20.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | 20.6L/100 km11.4mpg US13.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.6L/100 km12.6mpg US15.2mpg UK | 30.7L/100 km7.7mpg US9.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 240hp/t179kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 325Nm/t217lb-ft/ton Calculated | 323Nm/t216lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 691km429mi Calculated | 485km302mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,196cc256cu in | 6,750cc412cu in |
| Length | 5,090mm200in | 5,390mm212in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,932mm76in |
| Height | 1,448mm57in | 1,515mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 3,034mm119in | 3,116mm123in |
| Front track | 1,556mm61in | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,602mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 374L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 100L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Bentley Arnage R 6.7 i V8 16V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 6,100 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V | 4,000 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.8 s | 20.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 168 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 400 hp 298 kW |
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V | 405 hp 302 kW |
Bentley Arnage R 6.7 i V8 16V has 5 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V and Bentley Arnage R 6.7 i V8 16V: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 541 Nm 399 lb-ft |
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V | 835 Nm 616 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 5.3 s |
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V | 6.3 s |
Although Bentley Arnage R 6.7 i V8 16V has more power, Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V and Bentley Arnage R 6.7 i V8 16V: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V | 20.6 L/100 km 11.4 mpg US 13.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V and Bentley Arnage R 6.7 i V8 16V: 8.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 691 km 429 mi |
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V | 485 km 302 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 400 hp 298 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V | 405 hp 302 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V |
| 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V |
| 20.6 L/100 km 11.4 mpg US 13.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V | 20.6 L/100 km 11.4 mpg US 13.7 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 20.6 L/100 km 11.4 mpg US 13.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 405 hp 302 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 541 Nm 399 lb-ft | 835 Nm 616 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 20.6 L/100 km 11.4 mpg US 13.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 691 km 429 mi | 485 km 302 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 374 L 13.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V | Bentley Arnage R 6.7 i V8 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK | 20.6 L/100 km11.4 mpg US13.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.53 LC100 km | 36.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi | 58.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal | 3,090 L816 US gal680 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,229 LC/year | 5,408 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V
- Is 920 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 8.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 84 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 206 km (128 mi) more estimated range
- Has 96 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Bentley Arnage R 6.7 i V8 16V
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 294 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























