Jaguar XJ (X350)
Car comparison
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32VvsJaguar XJ (X351) 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XJ (X351)
5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful400 hp298 kW
- Highest torque541 Nm399 lb-ft
- Lightest1,665 kg3,671 lb
- Best power-to-weight240 hp/t179 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score74/100
Jaguar XJ (X351) 5.0 V8
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption17.0 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range726 km451 mi
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 385hp287kW |
| Torque | 541Nm399lb-ft | 515Nm380lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,755kg3,869lb |
| Gross weight | 2,250kg4,960lb | 2,300kg5,071lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 51.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 58.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.8s Calculated | 17.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.6L/100 km12.6mpg US15.2mpg UK | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 240hp/t179kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated | 219hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 325Nm/t217lb-ft/ton Calculated | 293Nm/t196lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 691km429mi Calculated | 726km451mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,196cc256cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 5,090mm200in | 5,127mm202in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,894mm75in |
| Height | 1,448mm57in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,034mm119in | 3,032mm119in |
| Front track | 1,556mm61in | 1,626mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,604mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 520L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 82L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XJ (X351) 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 6,100 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 | 6,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.8 s | 17.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 178 km/h 111 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 400 hp 298 kW |
| JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 | 385 hp 287 kW |
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V has 15 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X351) 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) 5.0 V8 and Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 541 Nm 399 lb-ft |
| JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 | 515 Nm 380 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 5.3 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 | 5.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V and Jaguar XJ (X351) 5.0 V8: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) 5.0 V8 and Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 | 219 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 691 km 429 mi |
| JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 | 726 km 451 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 400 hp 298 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 | 385 hp 287 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V |
| 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 |
| 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 | 219 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 385 hp 287 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 541 Nm 399 lb-ft | 515 Nm 380 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 691 km 429 mi | 726 km 451 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 219 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V | Jaguar XJ (X351) 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.53 LC100 km | 19.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,229 LC/year | 2,966 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 26 Nm more
- Is 90 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar XJ (X351) 5.0 V8
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 35 km (22 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























