BAIC X55
Car comparison
BAIC X55 1.5T · Stage 3vsBAIC X55 1.5T · Stage 2vsBAIC X55 1.5T · Stage 1vsBAIC X55 1.5T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBAIC X55
1.5T (Stage 2)
BAIC X55
1.5T (Stage 1)
BAIC X55
1.5T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BAIC X55 1.5T (Stage 3) 277 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed234 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful277 hp207 kW
- Highest torque473 Nm349 lb-ft
- Lightest1,665 kg3,671 lb
- Best power-to-weight167 hp/t124 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.2 L/100 km32.8 mpg US39.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range738 km459 mi
- Largest trunk350 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BAICX551.5T (Stage 3)277 hp | BAICX551.5T (Stage 2)240 hp | BAICX551.5T (Stage 1)218 hp | BAICX551.5T185 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 277hp207kW+92 hp | 240hp179kW+55 hp | 218hp163kW+33 hp | 185hp138kW |
| Torque | 473Nm349lb-ft+168 Nm | 412Nm304lb-ft+107 Nm | 372Nm274lb-ft+67 Nm | 305Nm225lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,665kg3,671lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 1,970kg4,343lb | 1,970kg4,343lb | 1,970kg4,343lb |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 67.5s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph-14.4 s Calculated | 72.2s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph-9.6 s Calculated | 75.4s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph-6.5 s Calculated | 81.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s-1.8 s | 6.7s-1.2 s | 7.1s-0.8 s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.0s-24.9 s Calculated | 31.2s-18.8 s Calculated | 36.7s-13.2 s Calculated | 49.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s-1.6 s Calculated | 6.3s-1.1 s Calculated | 6.7s-0.7 s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.8mpg US39.3mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.8mpg US39.3mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.8mpg US39.3mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.8mpg US39.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s-1.5 s Calculated | 14.8s-1.0 s Calculated | 15.1s-0.6 s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 167hp/t124kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 223Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated | 183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 738km459mi Calculated | 738km459mi Calculated | 738km459mi Calculated | 738km459mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,620mm182in | 4,620mm182in | 4,620mm182in | 4,620mm182in |
| Width | 1,886mm74in | 1,886mm74in | 1,886mm74in | 1,886mm74in |
| Height | 1,680mm66in | 1,680mm66in | 1,680mm66in | 1,680mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,735mm108in | 2,735mm108in | 2,735mm108in | 2,735mm108in |
| Front track | 1,615mm64in | 1,615mm64in | 1,615mm64in | 1,615mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,625mm64in | 1,625mm64in | 1,625mm64in | 1,625mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 160mm6in | 160mm6in | 160mm6in | 160mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 350L | 350L | 350L | 350L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 53L | 53L | 53L | 53L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BAIC X55 1.5T (Stage 3) 277 hp: Power / Torque
- BAIC X55 1.5T (Stage 2) 240 hp: Power / Torque
- BAIC X55 1.5T (Stage 1) 218 hp: Power / Torque
- BAIC X55 1.5T 185 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 3)277 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 2)240 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 1)218 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| BAICX551.5T185 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BAICX551.5T (Stage 3)277 hp | BAICX551.5T (Stage 2)240 hp | BAICX551.5T (Stage 1)218 hp | BAICX551.5T185 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 6.3 s | 6.7 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.7 s | 7.1 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.0 s | 31.2 s | 36.7 s | 49.9 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.4 s | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.6 s | 9.8 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.4 s | 12.7 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.8 s | 15.1 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph | 150 km/h 94 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 3)277 hp | 277 hp 207 kW |
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 2)240 hp | 240 hp 179 kW |
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 1)218 hp | 218 hp 163 kW |
| BAICX551.5T185 hp | 185 hp 138 kW |
BAIC X55 1.5T (Stage 3) 277 hp has 92 hp more than BAIC X55 1.5T 185 hp.
The biggest power difference is between BAIC X55 1.5T 185 hp and BAIC X55 1.5T (Stage 3) 277 hp: 92 hp (69 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 3)277 hp | 473 Nm 349 lb-ft |
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 2)240 hp | 412 Nm 304 lb-ft |
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 1)218 hp | 372 Nm 274 lb-ft |
| BAICX551.5T185 hp | 305 Nm 225 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 3)277 hp | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 2)240 hp | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 1)218 hp | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| BAICX551.5T185 hp | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 3)277 hp | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 2)240 hp | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 1)218 hp | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| BAICX551.5T185 hp | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 3)277 hp | 6.1 s |
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 2)240 hp | 6.7 s |
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 1)218 hp | 7.1 s |
| BAICX551.5T185 hp | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BAIC X55 1.5T (Stage 3) 277 hp and BAIC X55 1.5T 185 hp: 1.8 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are BAIC X55 1.5T (Stage 2) 240 hp and BAIC X55 1.5T (Stage 1) 218 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 3)277 hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.8 mpg US 39.3 mpg UK |
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 2)240 hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.8 mpg US 39.3 mpg UK |
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 1)218 hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.8 mpg US 39.3 mpg UK |
| BAICX551.5T185 hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.8 mpg US 39.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 3)277 hp | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 2)240 hp | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 1)218 hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| BAICX551.5T185 hp | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 3)277 hp | 738 km 459 mi |
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 2)240 hp | 738 km 459 mi |
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 1)218 hp | 738 km 459 mi |
| BAICX551.5T185 hp | 738 km 459 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 3)277 hp | 277 hp 207 kW | 6.1 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 2)240 hp | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.7 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 1)218 hp | 218 hp 163 kW | 7.1 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| BAICX551.5T185 hp | 185 hp 138 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 3)277 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 2)240 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 1)218 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BAICX551.5T185 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 3)277 hp |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.8 mpg US 39.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 2)240 hp |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.8 mpg US 39.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 1)218 hp |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.8 mpg US 39.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BAICX551.5T185 hp |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.8 mpg US 39.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BAIC X55 1.5T (Stage 3) 277 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 3)277 hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.8 mpg US 39.3 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 2)240 hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.8 mpg US 39.3 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 1)218 hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.8 mpg US 39.3 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| BAICX551.5T185 hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.8 mpg US 39.3 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 3)277 hp | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.8 mpg US 39.3 mpg UK |
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 2)240 hp | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.8 mpg US 39.3 mpg UK |
| BAICX551.5T (Stage 1)218 hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.8 mpg US 39.3 mpg UK |
| BAICX551.5T185 hp | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.8 mpg US 39.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BAICX551.5T (Stage 3)277 hp | BAICX551.5T (Stage 2)240 hp | BAICX551.5T (Stage 1)218 hp | BAICX551.5T185 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 277 hp 207 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | 218 hp 163 kW | 185 hp 138 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 473 Nm 349 lb-ft | 412 Nm 304 lb-ft | 372 Nm 274 lb-ft | 305 Nm 225 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.7 s | 7.1 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.8 mpg US 39.3 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.8 mpg US 39.3 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.8 mpg US 39.3 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.8 mpg US 39.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 738 km 459 mi | 738 km 459 mi | 738 km 459 mi | 738 km 459 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BAIC X55 1.5T (Stage 3) 277 hp | BAIC X55 1.5T (Stage 2) 240 hp | BAIC X55 1.5T (Stage 1) 218 hp | BAIC X55 1.5T 185 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.8 mpg US39.3 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.8 mpg US39.3 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.8 mpg US39.3 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.8 mpg US39.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.57 LC100 km | 12.57 LC100 km | 12.57 LC100 km | 12.57 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.22 LC100 mi | 20.22 LC100 mi | 20.22 LC100 mi | 20.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,077 L285 US gal237 UK gal | 1,077 L285 US gal237 UK gal | 1,077 L285 US gal237 UK gal | 1,077 L285 US gal237 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,885 LC/year | 1,885 LC/year | 1,885 LC/year | 1,885 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BAIC X55 1.5T (Stage 3) 277 hp
- Has 37 hp more
- Has 61 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
BAIC X55 1.5T (Stage 2) 240 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























