Porsche Boxster (981)
Car comparison
Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7vsAUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TTS Roadster (8S)
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight214 hp/t159 kW/t4.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions173 g/km
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score67/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7
- Fastest top speed264 km/h164 mph
- Lightest1,330 kg2,932 lb
- Best estimated range762 km473 mi
- Largest trunk280 L
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 310hp231kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,330kg2,932lb | 1,450kg3,197lb |
| Gross weight | 1,645kg3,627lb | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 72.0s99% target: 261 km/h / 162 mph Calculated | 65.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.5s Calculated | 18.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 199hp/t149kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated | 214hp/t159kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 262Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 762km473mi Calculated | 733km456mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,706cc165cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,374mm172in | 4,191mm165in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,282mm50in | 1,345mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,505mm99in |
| Front track | - | 1,574mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,553mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 280L | 280L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 195g/km | 173g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7: Power / Torque
- AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 6,700 rpm | 4,500-6,500 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 5,800-6,200 rpm | 1,800-5,700 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.5 s | 18.0 s |
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 265 hp 198 kW |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 310 hp 231 kW |
AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI has 45 hp more than Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7 and AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI: 45 hp (34 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 5.8 s |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 5.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI and Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI and Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 214 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 762 km 473 mi |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 733 km 456 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.8 s | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 214 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 762 km 473 mi | 733 km 456 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 195 g/km | 173 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 214 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7 | AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7
- Is 120 kg lighter
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 29 km (18 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 45 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 22 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























