Porsche Boxster (981)
Car comparison
Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7vsAUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TTS Roadster (8J)
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed262 km/h163 mph
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Best power-to-weight195 hp/t145 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions183 g/km
- Best estimated range810 km503 mi
- Largest trunk280 L
- Best overall score52/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score31/100
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best performance score63/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,360kg2,998lb | 1,475kg3,252lb |
| Gross weight | 1,675kg3,693lb | 1,795kg3,957lb |
| Top speed | 262 km/h 163 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.6s99% target: 259 km/h / 161 mph Calculated | 76.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.4s Calculated | 20.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 5.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 13.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 195hp/t145kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 184hp/t138kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated | 237Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 810km503mi Calculated | 723km449mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,706cc165cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,374mm172in | 4,198mm165in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,282mm50in | 1,350mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,468mm97in |
| Front track | - | 1,555mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,546mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 280L | 250L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 183g/km | 189g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7: Power / Torque
- AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 6,700 rpm | 4,500-6,500 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.4 s | 20.4 s |
| Top speed | 262 km/h 163 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 11.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 13.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 265 hp 198 kW |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 272 hp 203 kW |
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI has 7 hp more than Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7 and AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 5.7 s |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 5.7 s |
Although AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI has more power, Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 184 hp/t 138 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 810 km 503 mi |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 723 km 449 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.7 s | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 272 hp 203 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 184 hp/t 138 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 262 km/h 163 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 810 km 503 mi | 723 km 449 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 183 g/km | 189 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 184 hp/t 138 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7 | AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 14.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 2,179 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7
- Is 115 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 87 km (54 mi) more estimated range
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























