Car comparison

AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSIvsKTM X-Bow R 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010

2.0 TFSI

272 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedRoadster2010-2014
VS

KTM X-Bow

R 2.0

240 hp1984 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedRoadster2007-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI

  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    272 hp
    203 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    759 km
    472 mi
  • Best overall score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100
  • Best practicality score
    30/100

KTM X-Bow R 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.9 s
  • Lightest
    790 kg
    1,742 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    304 hp/t
    227 kW/t
    3.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    64/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSIKTMX-BowR 2.0
Power
272hp203kW
240hp179kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
310Nm229lb-ft
Curb weight
1,495kg3,296lb
790kg1,742lb
Gross weight
1,815kg4,001lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
74.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
42.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.5s
3.9s
0-200 km/h
19.8s
Calculated
16.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.2s
Calculated
3.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.6s
Calculated
12.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
182hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb
Calculated
304hp/t227kW/t138hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton
Calculated
392Nm/t263lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
759km472mi
Calculated
513km319mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,198mm165in
3,738mm147in
Width
1,842mm73in
1,915mm75in
Height
1,350mm53in
1,202mm47in
Wheelbase
2,468mm97in
2,430mm96in
Front track
1,555mm61in
1,672mm66in
Rear track
1,546mm61in
1,626mm64in
Trunk volume
250L
-
Doors
2
-
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
60L
40L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSIKTM X-Bow R 2.0PowerTorque
  • AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
  • KTM X-Bow R 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI6,000 rpm2,500-5,000 rpm6,250 rpm
KTMX-BowR 2.06,500 rpm2,000 rpm7,200 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSIKTMX-BowR 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.2 s
3.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.5 s
3.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
19.8 s
16.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
5.9 s
5.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.9 s
7.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.5 s
10.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.6 s
12.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
170 km/h
106 mph
181 km/h
112 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
272 hp
203 kW
KTMX-BowR 2.0
240 hp
179 kW

AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI has 32 hp more than KTM X-Bow R 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between KTM X-Bow R 2.0 and AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI: 32 hp (24 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
KTMX-BowR 2.0
310 Nm
229 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
1,495 kg
3,296 lb
KTMX-BowR 2.0
790 kg
1,742 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
KTMX-BowR 2.0
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI5.5 s
KTMX-BowR 2.03.9 s

Although AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI has more power, KTM X-Bow R 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between KTM X-Bow R 2.0 and AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI: 1.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
KTMX-BowR 2.0
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
182 hp/t
136 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
KTMX-BowR 2.0
304 hp/t
227 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
759 km
472 mi
KTMX-BowR 2.0
513 km
319 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
272 hp
203 kW
5.5 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
KTMX-BowR 2.0
240 hp
179 kW
3.9 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
250 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,198 mm
165.3 in
Height
1,350 mm
53.1 in
KTMX-BowR 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,738 mm
147.2 in
Height
1,202 mm
47.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
KTMX-BowR 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

KTM X-Bow R 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
5.5 s
KTMX-BowR 2.0
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
3.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
182 hp/t
136 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
KTMX-BowR 2.0
304 hp/t
227 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSIKTMX-BowR 2.0
Power
272 hp
203 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
310 Nm
229 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.5 s
3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Lightness
1,495 kg
3,296 lb
790 kg
1,742 lb
Fuel consumption
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
250 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,198 mm
165.3 in
Height
1,350 mm
53.1 in
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,738 mm
147.2 in
Height
1,202 mm
47.3 in
Range score
759 km
472 mi
513 km
319 mi
Trunk score
250 L
8.8 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
182 hp/t
136 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
304 hp/t
227 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI TTS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSIKTM X-Bow R 2.0
Consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.83 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.25 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,074 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI

  • Has 32 hp more
  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 247 km (153 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

KTM X-Bow R 2.0

  • Is 705 kg lighter
  • Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 122 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
KTM X-Bow R 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSIvsAUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI
R 2.0
1.8
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsLotus2-Eleven1.8
2.0 TFSI
3.2i V6 24V
VS
AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSIvsAUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V
R 2.0
S Cup 1.8
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsLotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSIvsAUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
R 2.0
28i
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsBMWZ4 (E89)28i
2.0 TFSI
2.5 TFSI
VS
AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSIvsAUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI
R 2.0
2.9
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsPorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSIvsAUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI
R 2.0
2.0 TFSI
VS
KTMX-BowR 2.0vsAUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSIvsAUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
2.5 TFSI
VS
AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSIvsAUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI vs KTM X-Bow R 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster