AUDI TTS Roadster (8J)
Car comparison
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSIvsLotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Elise (SERIES 2)
1.8 i 16V 111R
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Largest trunk250 L
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score30/100
Lotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Lightest850 kg1,874 lb
- Best power-to-weight226 hp/t168 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 272hp203kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 180Nm133lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 850kg1,874lb |
| Gross weight | 1,815kg4,001lb | - |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 49.9s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.7s Calculated | 18.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 182hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 226hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 759km472mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,796cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,198mm165in | 3,785mm149in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | 1,719mm68in |
| Height | 1,350mm53in | 1,143mm45in |
| Wheelbase | 2,468mm97in | 2,300mm91in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | 1,457mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,503mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 250L | 115L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 38L |
| CO2 emissions | 184g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Lotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | 7,800 rpm | 6,800 rpm | 8,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.7 s | 18.0 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 272 hp 203 kW |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | 192 hp 143 kW |
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI has 80 hp more than Lotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R and AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI: 80 hp (60 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | 180 Nm 133 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | 850 kg 1,874 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 5.5 s |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | 4.9 s |
Although AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI has more power, Lotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R and AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 272 hp 203 kW | 5.5 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | 192 hp 143 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 272 hp 203 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 180 Nm 133 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 850 kg 1,874 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 759 km 472 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 184 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | 115 L 4.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 80 hp more
- Has 170 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 135 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Lotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R
- Is 645 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 44 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























