AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSIvsBMW Z4 (E89) 35i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW Z4 (E89)
35i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Best power-to-weight225 hp/t168 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Best estimated range659 km410 mi
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score71/100
BMW Z4 (E89) 35i
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions210 g/km
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | BMWZ4 (E89)35i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,510kg3,329lb | 1,600kg3,527lb |
| Gross weight | 1,830kg4,034lb | 1,855kg4,090lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 67.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 5.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.0s Calculated | 17.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 225hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated | 191hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 298Nm/t199lb-ft/ton Calculated | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 659km410mi Calculated | 611km380mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,480cc151cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,198mm165in | 4,239mm167in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | 1,790mm70in |
| Height | 1,348mm53in | 1,291mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,468mm97in | 2,496mm98in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | 1,511mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,559mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 250L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 212g/km | 210g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
- BMW Z4 (E89) 35i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | 5,400-6,500 rpm | 1,600-5,300 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 5,800 rpm | 1,300-5,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | BMWZ4 (E89)35i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 5.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.0 s | 17.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 181 km/h 113 mph | 176 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | 340 hp 254 kW |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 306 hp 228 kW |
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI has 34 hp more than BMW Z4 (E89) 35i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 35i and AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI: 34 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | 4.7 s |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 5.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI and BMW Z4 (E89) 35i: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 191 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | 659 km 410 mi |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 611 km 380 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | 340 hp 254 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 191 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | BMWZ4 (E89)35i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 5.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 659 km 410 mi | 611 km 380 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 212 g/km | 210 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 191 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI | BMW Z4 (E89) 35i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.92 LC100 km | 15.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,389 LC/year | 2,363 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI
- Has 34 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 90 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 48 km (30 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW Z4 (E89) 35i
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 2 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























