Porsche Boxster (987) · Facelift 2009
Car comparison
Porsche Boxster (987) · Facelift 2009 S 3.4vsBMW Z4 (E89) 35i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW Z4 (E89)
35i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z4 (E89) 35i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.1 s
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions210 g/km
- Best overall score56/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 S 3.4
- Fastest top speed272 km/h169 mph
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Lightest1,380 kg3,042 lb
- Best power-to-weight225 hp/t168 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range691 km430 mi
- Best performance score68/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | BMWZ4 (E89)35i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 310hp231kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,380kg3,042lb | 1,600kg3,527lb |
| Gross weight | 1,675kg3,693lb | 1,855kg4,090lb |
| Top speed | 272 km/h 169 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 78.5s99% target: 269 km/h / 167 mph Calculated | 67.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 5.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.2s | 17.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 225hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated | 191hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 261Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 691km430mi Calculated | 611km380mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,436cc210cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,342mm171in | 4,239mm167in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,790mm70in |
| Height | 1,294mm51in | 1,291mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,415mm95in | 2,496mm98in |
| Front track | 1,486mm59in | 1,511mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,528mm60in | 1,559mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 123mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 130L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 221g/km | 210g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 S 3.4: Power / Torque
- BMW Z4 (E89) 35i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 7,200 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 5,800 rpm | 1,300-5,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | BMWZ4 (E89)35i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 5.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.2 s | 17.6 s |
| Top speed | 272 km/h 169 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 174 km/h 108 mph | 176 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 310 hp 231 kW |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 306 hp 228 kW |
Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 S 3.4 has 4 hp more than BMW Z4 (E89) 35i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 35i and Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 S 3.4: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 272 km/h 169 mph |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 5.2 s |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 5.1 s |
Although Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 S 3.4 has more power, BMW Z4 (E89) 35i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 35i and Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 S 3.4: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 191 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 691 km 430 mi |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 611 km 380 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.2 s | 272 km/h 169 mph |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 S 3.4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 191 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | BMWZ4 (E89)35i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 310 hp 231 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 5.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 272 km/h 169 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 691 km 430 mi | 611 km 380 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 221 g/km | 210 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 130 L 4.6 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 191 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 S 3.4 | BMW Z4 (E89) 35i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 15.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,363 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 S 3.4
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 220 kg lighter
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 33 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 80 km (50 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW Z4 (E89) 35i
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 11 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























