Jaguar C-X16
Car comparison
Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6vsAUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) · Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) · Facelift 2010
2.5 TFSI plus
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Highest torque465 Nm343 lb-ft
- Lightest1,475 kg3,252 lb
- Best power-to-weight244 hp/t182 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score68/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph
- Most powerful380 hp283 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions165 g/km
- Best performance score77/100
- Best economy score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarC-X163.0 V6 | AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 380hp283kW | 360hp268kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 465Nm343lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 1,475kg3,252lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,875kg4,134lb |
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | 280 km/h 174 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.3s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 57.3s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 4.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.7s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 3.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 12.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 238hp/t177kW/t108hp/1000 lb Calculated | 244hp/t182kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated | 315Nm/t211lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 706km439mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 2,480cc151cu in |
| Length | 4,445mm175in | 4,198mm165in |
| Width | 2,048mm81in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,297mm51in | 1,342mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,622mm103in | 2,468mm97in |
| Front track | - | 1,555mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,546mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 290L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 700L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | - | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 165g/km | 197g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarC-X163.0 V6 | AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 3.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 4.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.7 s | 13.3 s |
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | 280 km/h 174 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 7.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 12.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 190 km/h 118 mph | 192 km/h 119 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarC-X163.0 V6 | 380 hp 283 kW |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 360 hp 268 kW |
Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6 has 20 hp more than AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus and Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarC-X163.0 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarC-X163.0 V6 | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarC-X163.0 V6 | 300 km/h 186 mph |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 280 km/h 174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarC-X163.0 V6 | 4.4 s |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 4.1 s |
Although Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6 has more power, AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus and Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarC-X163.0 V6 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6 and AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarC-X163.0 V6 | 238 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarC-X163.0 V6 | 380 hp 283 kW | 4.4 s | 300 km/h 186 mph |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 360 hp 268 kW | 4.1 s | 280 km/h 174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarC-X163.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarC-X163.0 V6 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarC-X163.0 V6 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarC-X163.0 V6 | 238 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarC-X163.0 V6 | AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 380 hp 283 kW | 360 hp 268 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 4.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | 280 km/h 174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 706 km 439 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 165 g/km | 197 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 290 L 10.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 238 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6 | AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 14.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 2,231 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 32 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus
- Has 15 Nm more
- Is 125 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























