Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250vsAUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT Roadster (8J)
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed244 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque310 Nm229 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions169 g/km
- Best estimated range822 km511 mi
- Best overall score47/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score87/100
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Lightest1,315 kg2,899 lb
- Best power-to-weight152 hp/t113 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk250 L
- Best practicality score30/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 310Nm229lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,400kg3,086lb | 1,315kg2,899lb |
| Gross weight | 1,790kg3,946lb | 1,635kg3,605lb |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.7s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated | 76.9s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.4s Calculated | 26.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 822km511mi Calculated | 705km438mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,796cc110cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,134mm163in | 4,178mm164in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,301mm51in | 1,358mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,430mm96in | 2,468mm97in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,572mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,558mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 225L | 250L |
| Max trunk volume | 335L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 169g/km | 186g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,300 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 5,100-6,000 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.4 s | 26.8 s |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 204 hp 152 kW |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 has 4 hp more than AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 1,315 kg 2,899 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 6.5 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 6.5 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 and AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 822 km 511 mi |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 705 km 438 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.5 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.5 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | 1,315 kg 2,899 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 822 km 511 mi | 705 km 438 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 169 g/km | 186 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 | AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 117 km (73 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 17 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























