Lotus Elise (SERIES 3)
Car comparison
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8vsAUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT Roadster (8J)
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Lightest952 kg2,099 lb
- Best power-to-weight231 hp/t172 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score30/100
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Best estimated range769 km478 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 952kg2,099lb | 1,405kg3,097lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,725kg3,803lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 47.0s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 76.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.1s Calculated | 27.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 231hp/t172kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated | 142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 263Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 533km331mi Calculated | 769km478mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 3,824mm151in | 4,178mm164in |
| Width | 1,719mm68in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,117mm44in | 1,358mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,300mm91in | 2,468mm97in |
| Front track | - | 1,572mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,558mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 250L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 175g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 6,800 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 5,100-6,000 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.1 s | 27.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 220 hp 164 kW |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8 has 20 hp more than AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI and Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 952 kg 2,099 lb |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 4.6 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8 and AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI: 1.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 231 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 533 km 331 mi |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 769 km 478 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 220 hp 164 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | 231 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8 | AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 952 kg 2,099 lb | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 533 km 331 mi | 769 km 478 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 175 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 231 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8 | AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S Cup 1.8
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 453 kg lighter
- Is 1.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 89 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 236 km (147 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























