AUDI TT Coupe (8N)
Car comparison
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) 1.8 TvsNissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan 200 SX (S14)
2.0 i 16V Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) 1.8 T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed243 km/h151 mph
- Most powerful225 hp168 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight161 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best practicality score47/100
Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo
- Lightest1,350 kg2,976 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range739 km459 mi
- Largest trunk307 L
- Best economy score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T | Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 225hp168kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 265Nm195lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,395kg3,075lb | 1,350kg2,976lb |
| Gross weight | 1,765kg3,891lb | 1,780kg3,924lb |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.5s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 87.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.1s Calculated | 31.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 674km419mi Calculated | 739km459mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,781cc109cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,041mm159in | 4,560mm180in |
| Width | 1,764mm69in | 1,730mm68in |
| Height | 1,345mm53in | 1,295mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,429mm96in | 2,525mm99in |
| Front track | 1,528mm60in | 1,480mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,505mm59in | 1,470mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 220L | 307L |
| Max trunk volume | 490L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | 221g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TT Coupe (8N) 1.8 T: Power / Torque
- Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T | 5,900 rpm | 2,200 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 6,400 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T | Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.1 s | 31.3 s |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T | 225 hp 168 kW |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 200 hp 149 kW |
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) 1.8 T has 25 hp more than Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo and AUDI TT Coupe (8N) 1.8 T: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T | 6.4 s |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8N) 1.8 T and Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T | 674 km 419 mi |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 739 km 459 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T | 225 hp 168 kW | 6.4 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.5 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) 1.8 T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T | Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 225 hp 168 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 674 km 419 mi | 739 km 459 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 221 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 220 L 7.8 cu ft | 307 L 10.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT Coupe (8N) 1.8 T | Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) 1.8 T
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 15 Nm more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 65 km (40 mi) more estimated range
- Has 87 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























