Volvo C30
Car comparison
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5vsAUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT Coupe (8J)
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Lightest1,260 kg2,778 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.7 L/100 km22.0 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions183 g/km
- Best estimated range714 km444 mi
- Largest trunk290 L
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight162 hp/t121 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score57/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,422kg3,135lb | 1,260kg2,778lb |
| Gross weight | 1,860kg4,101lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 90.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 80.0s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.1s Calculated | 26.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 162hp/t121kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 159hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 222Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 713km443mi Calculated | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,252mm167in | 4,178mm164in |
| Width | 1,782mm70in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,447mm57in | 1,352mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,468mm97in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,572mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,558mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 233L | 290L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 700L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 208g/km | 183g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-5,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 5,100-6,000 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.1 s | 26.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 230 hp 172 kW |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 has 30 hp more than AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI and Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 1,422 kg 3,135 lb |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 1,260 kg 2,778 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 6.7 s |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 6.6 s |
Although Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 has more power, AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI and Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI and Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 159 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 713 km 443 mi |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 714 km 444 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 230 hp 172 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.6 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
| 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 159 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,422 kg 3,135 lb | 1,260 kg 2,778 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 713 km 443 mi | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 208 g/km | 183 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 233 L 8.2 cu ft | 290 L 10.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 159 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 | AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.22 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.50 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,284 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Is 162 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 km (1 mi) more estimated range
- Has 57 L more trunk volume
- Emits 25 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























