Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 5.0 V8vsAUDI SQ8 e-tron 114 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI SQ8 e-tron
114 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful525 hp391 kW
- Lightest2,383 kg5,254 lb
- Best power-to-weight220 hp/t164 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk900 L
- Best economy score73/100
- Best practicality score93/100
AUDI SQ8 e-tron 114 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Highest torque973 Nm718 lb-ft
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 525hp391kW | 503hp375kW |
| Torque | 625Nm461lb-ft | 973Nm718lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,383kg5,254lb | 2,650kg5,842lb |
| Gross weight | - | 3,290kg7,253lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 68.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 45.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.7s Calculated | 21.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 220hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated | 190hp/t142kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 262Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated | 367Nm/t246lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 815km506mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,000cc305cu in | - |
| Length | 5,000mm197in | 4,915mm194in |
| Width | 2,073mm82in | 1,976mm78in |
| Height | 1,869mm74in | 1,631mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,922mm115in | 2,928mm115in |
| Front track | 1,693mm67in | 1,683mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,685mm66in | 1,683mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 220mm9in | - |
| Trunk volume | 900L | 569L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,637L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 104L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 294g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.7 s | 21.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 525 hp 391 kW |
| AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh | 503 hp 375 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8 has 22 hp more than AUDI SQ8 e-tron 114 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI SQ8 e-tron 114 kWh and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8: 22 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft |
| AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh | 973 Nm 718 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 2,383 kg 5,254 lb |
| AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh | 2,650 kg 5,842 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 5.4 s |
| AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh | 4.5 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8 has more power, AUDI SQ8 e-tron 114 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI SQ8 e-tron 114 kWh and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8: 0.9 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 525 hp 391 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh | 503 hp 375 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 525 hp 391 kW | 503 hp 375 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft | 973 Nm 718 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,383 kg 5,254 lb | 2,650 kg 5,842 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 815 km 506 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 294 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 900 L 31.8 cu ft | 569 L 20.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,905 L503 US gal419 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,334 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8
- Has 22 hp more
- Is 267 kg lighter
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 331 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
AUDI SQ8 e-tron 114 kWh
- Has 348 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























