AUDI S4 (8D/B5)
Car comparison
AUDI S4 (8D/B5) 2.7 BiTurbo V6vsSaab 9-5 2.3 T 16V Aero
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSaab 9-5
2.3 T 16V Aero
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI S4 (8D/B5) 2.7 BiTurbo V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.6 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Best power-to-weight175 hp/t131 kW/t5.7 kg/hp
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score64/100
Saab 9-5 2.3 T 16V Aero
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.8 L/100 km15.9 mpg US19.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range714 km444 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6 | Saab9-52.3 T 16V Aero |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,510kg3,329lb | 1,540kg3,395lb |
| Gross weight | 2,060kg4,542lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 55.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 70.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.6s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.2s Calculated | 21.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 175hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated | 162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 265Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 549km341mi Calculated | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,671cc163cu in | 2,290cc140cu in |
| Length | 4,483mm176in | 4,810mm189in |
| Width | 1,733mm68in | 1,790mm70in |
| Height | 1,396mm55in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,607mm103in | 2,705mm106in |
| Front track | 1,498mm59in | 1,520mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,490mm59in | 1,520mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 440L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 271g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI S4 (8D/B5) 2.7 BiTurbo V6: Power / Torque
- Saab 9-5 2.3 T 16V Aero: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6 | 5,800 rpm | 1,850-3,600 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| Saab9-52.3 T 16V Aero | 5,300 rpm | 1,900 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6 | Saab9-52.3 T 16V Aero |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.6 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.2 s | 21.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 178 km/h 111 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6 | 265 hp 198 kW |
| Saab9-52.3 T 16V Aero | 250 hp 186 kW |
AUDI S4 (8D/B5) 2.7 BiTurbo V6 has 15 hp more than Saab 9-5 2.3 T 16V Aero.
The biggest power difference is between Saab 9-5 2.3 T 16V Aero and AUDI S4 (8D/B5) 2.7 BiTurbo V6: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Saab9-52.3 T 16V Aero | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6 | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
| Saab9-52.3 T 16V Aero | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Saab9-52.3 T 16V Aero | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6 | 5.6 s |
| Saab9-52.3 T 16V Aero | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI S4 (8D/B5) 2.7 BiTurbo V6 and Saab 9-5 2.3 T 16V Aero: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| Saab9-52.3 T 16V Aero | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Saab 9-5 2.3 T 16V Aero and AUDI S4 (8D/B5) 2.7 BiTurbo V6: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6 | 175 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
| Saab9-52.3 T 16V Aero | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6 | 549 km 341 mi |
| Saab9-52.3 T 16V Aero | 714 km 444 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6 | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Saab9-52.3 T 16V Aero | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Saab9-52.3 T 16V Aero |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6 |
| 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Saab9-52.3 T 16V Aero |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI S4 (8D/B5) 2.7 BiTurbo V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
| Saab9-52.3 T 16V Aero | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6 | 175 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| Saab9-52.3 T 16V Aero | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6 | Saab9-52.3 T 16V Aero | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.6 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 549 km 341 mi | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 271 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 175 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI S4 (8D/B5) 2.7 BiTurbo V6 | Saab 9-5 2.3 T 16V Aero |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.78 LC100 km | 17.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,966 LC/year | 2,573 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI S4 (8D/B5) 2.7 BiTurbo V6
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 30 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Saab 9-5 2.3 T 16V Aero
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 166 km (103 mi) more estimated range
- Has 60 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























