Saab 9-5
Car comparison
Saab 9-5 2.3 T 16V AerovsVolvo S70 2.3 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S70
2.3 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Saab 9-5 2.3 T 16V Aero
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption14.8 L/100 km15.9 mpg US19.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Volvo S70 2.3 T5
- Lightest1,460 kg3,219 lb
- Best power-to-weight164 hp/t123 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Saab9-52.3 T 16V Aero | VolvoS702.3 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,460kg3,219lb |
| Gross weight | 2,110kg4,652lb | 1,910kg4,211lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 64.6s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.7s Calculated | 23.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 164hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,290cc140cu in | 2,319cc142cu in |
| Length | 4,810mm189in | 4,720mm186in |
| Width | 1,790mm70in | 1,760mm69in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,400mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,705mm106in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,520mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,470mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 470L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Saab 9-5 2.3 T 16V Aero: Power / Torque
- Volvo S70 2.3 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Saab9-52.3 T 16V Aero | 5,300 rpm | 1,900 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
| VolvoS702.3 T5 | 5,100 rpm | 2,700 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Saab9-52.3 T 16V Aero | VolvoS702.3 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.7 s | 23.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Saab9-52.3 T 16V Aero | 250 hp 186 kW |
| VolvoS702.3 T5 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Saab 9-5 2.3 T 16V Aero has 10 hp more than Volvo S70 2.3 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S70 2.3 T5 and Saab 9-5 2.3 T 16V Aero: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Saab9-52.3 T 16V Aero | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolvoS702.3 T5 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Saab9-52.3 T 16V Aero | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| VolvoS702.3 T5 | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Saab9-52.3 T 16V Aero | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS702.3 T5 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Saab9-52.3 T 16V Aero | 6.9 s |
| VolvoS702.3 T5 | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Saab 9-5 2.3 T 16V Aero and Volvo S70 2.3 T5: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Saab9-52.3 T 16V Aero | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| VolvoS702.3 T5 | 164 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Saab9-52.3 T 16V Aero | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS702.3 T5 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.0 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saab9-52.3 T 16V Aero |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS702.3 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Saab9-52.3 T 16V Aero | VolvoS702.3 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 164 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Saab 9-5 2.3 T 16V Aero |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,573 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Saab 9-5 2.3 T 16V Aero
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Volvo S70 2.3 T5
- Is 80 kg lighter
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























